Delta Farm Press Logo

Will irrigated soybean area continue to expand in eastern Arkansas?

Trend analysis shows that soybean have continued to increase in counties along the Mississippi River.

Brad Watkins, Professor

December 20, 2023

3 Min Read
Irrigated Soybeans
Every county in eastern Arkansas experienced an increase in irrigated soybean acres from 1982 to 2017, but counties experiencing the greatest expansion were those bordering the Mississippi River.Brent Murphree

The Mid-South region - eastern Arkansas, northeast Louisiana, Mississippi, and southeast Missouri - experienced a significant expansion in irrigated soybean acres since the beginning of the 1980s.

Irrigated agriculture in this region is highly dependent on groundwater from the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer. Eastern Arkansas is the largest soybean producer in the Mid-South.

From Census year 1982 to Census year 2017, Arkansas irrigated soybean area expanded by +2.108 million acres.

Every county in eastern Arkansas experienced an increase in irrigated soybean acres during this time, but counties experiencing the greatest expansion were those bordering the Mississippi River. Are irrigated soybean acres still expanding or are they beginning to level off in eastern Arkansas? Will irrigated soybean area expansion continue across the region?

Harvested acres

Area trend analysis was conducted to answer these questions. Irrigated soybean harvested acres data were collected for all 26 counties in eastern Arkansas for the period 1980 – 2018 from the USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service.

 Missing observations in the NASS data and additional acre observations for the period 2019 – 2023 were obtained from the USDA Farm Service Agency. 

Will_Irrigated_Soybean_Area_Continue_to_Expand_in_Eastern_Arkansas-2.jpg

Figure 1 presents irrigated soybean acreage trends for the 1980 – 2023 period. Three basic patterns of acreage trends are identified:

Reached Plateau

Counties shaded orange represent counties that achieved a plateau at some point during 1980 – 2023 period. Irrigated soybean acres for these counties increased and then leveled off during the 44-year period. 

Declining

Counties shaded red represent counties where irrigated soybean acres initially increased until an acre maximum was reached. After the acre maximum was reached, irrigated soybean acres began to decline. 

Growing

Finally, counties shaded either light blue or dark blue represent counties where acres continue to grow and do not appear to have reached a plateau. The counties shaded light blue are counties with acres growing at a constant rate over time. The constant rate of growth ranged from +0.65 acres per year (Drew County) to +3.79 acres per year (Phillips County).

The dark blue counties (Chicot and Mississippi) represent counties where the rate of growth is not constant but expanding over time, with the most recent rate of growth reaching +5.26 acres per year for Chicot County and +7.23 acres per year for Mississippi County.

What information can be gleaned from these trends? Irrigated soybean acres in counties shaded red or orange are either declining (the red counties) or leveling off (the orange counties), implying irrigated area expansion in these counties has likely ended.

Most of these counties are located in Critical Groundwater Areas where groundwater is being depleted faster than the rate of recharge.

In addition, many of these counties have converted nearly all available non-irrigated soybean acres to irrigated acres.

Counties shaded either light blue or dark blue are still expanding in soybean irrigated area. Most of these counties are located either alongside or within close proximity to the Mississippi River, where groundwater is more plentiful.

Also, most of these counties still have a considerable amount of non-irrigated soybean area left for future irrigation conversion.

These results highlight the importance of both groundwater availability and land availability to continued future sustainability of soybean production in eastern Arkansas and by implication the Mid-South region.    

Source: Southern Ag Today, a collaboration of economists from 13 Southern universities.

Read more about:

Irrigation

About the Author(s)

Brad Watkins

Professor, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture

Dr. Watkins is a native of Northwest Arkansas and grew up on a small hillside cattle farm in the Ozark Mountains. He received his B.S. degree in Agricultural Business (1988) and his M.S. degree in Agricultural Economics (1990) at the University of Arkansas. In 1994, he received his Ph. D. degree in Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University. He then took a postdoctoral economist position in the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) at Beltsville, Maryland and was employed with the ARS until 1999. While in the ARS, Dr. Watkins conducted economic research in the areas of sustainable agriculture, precision farming, and technology adoption. From 2000 through 2001, Dr. Watkins lived in San Antonio, Texas and was employed as an industry analyst with the firm Frost & Sullivan, where he conducted market research and wrote syndicated reports about the U.S. food industry and other various markets.

Dr. Watkins has been a member of the Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness at the University of Arkansas since 2002. He is stationed at the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Rice Research and Extension Center in Stuttgart, Arkansas. He has a 75 percent research appointment and a 25 percent Extension appointment. The primary focus of his research program is identification of production systems and management practices leading to reduction in production inputs and greater profitability in rice production. His Extension program is devoted to dissemination of economic information related to alternative cropping systems, management practices, and/or technologies that promote the long-term economic and environmental sustainability of rice production in Arkansas. He also works on other economic problems important to Arkansas, such as economic evaluation of alternative government programs in Arkansas row crops, quantification of economic losses to Arkansas agriculture resulting from extreme weather events, and economic analysis of cattle and stocker grazing systems. A strong component of his program is interaction with scientists from other disciplines.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like