Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: United States

Time to look closer at COVID relief money

TAGS: Farm Policy
Kativ_iStock_Getty Image money blowing from cornfield
Nearly $1 trillion in previously authorized relief not spent as more money set to go out.

Over the last year, Congress has come together five times to pass massive, bipartisan bills totaling roughly $4 trillion in relief measures to help American families and businesses weather the pandemic. But as Democrats assumed control of the White House and tightened margins in Congress, their promises for unity are nowhere to be found in its recent relief package and first major priority.

Just as the current administration looks to evaluate policies of the past administration in distributing the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program payments, isn’t it time all of Congress looks at where funds from the previous COVID packages are using allocated money before sending out more?

Related: Vilsack promises timely review of CFAP

One of Republicans’ biggest concerns with the latest COVID package is the lack of Republican input and accountability on the nearly $1 trillion in funds that haven’t been spent in previous packages. The USDA has only obligated 62% of the COVID relief monies provided by Congress to date.

In the House Agriculture Committee markup of COVID relief provisions, amendments were voted down that were intended to limit spending additional funds until at least 80% of previously allocated funds.

Related: House Ag Committee starts out with partisanship

Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, joined her colleagues Sens. Rick Scott, R-Fla., and James Lankford, R-Okla., on the Senate floor to introduce a proposal that would require full transparency and accounting of unspent funds from previous COVID-19 relief packages.

“Bottom line: we need transparency and to know what has and has not been spent so far,” Ernst says. “Until we have those details, we should not continue throwing money to Washington bureaucrats, and we certainly should not support this partisan, $1.9 trillion dollar package that includes many items that are completely unrelated to COVID-19.”

The reconciliation process, which the relief package currently is being shepherded through, requires only a simple majority in the House and Senate, not the normal 60-vote threshold in the Senate. Although Republicans were brought in early to discuss components of President Joe Biden’s COVID relief plan, what we’ve seen in recent weeks sets a poor precedent on accountability and bipartisanship.

Related: What’s in House’s COVID relief bill for agriculture?

“The proposals in the nearly $2 trillion package include sweeping policy changes that deserve thorough, bipartisan scrutiny at the committee level,” according to an opinion piece penned by Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee. 

Crapo notes according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, only about 1% of the entire package goes toward COVID vaccines, and 5% is truly focused on public health needs surrounding the pandemic. More than 15% of the package – about $300 billion – is spent on long-standing policy priorities that are not directly related to the current crisis.

“The coronavirus pandemic has exacted a terrible toll on America, and another relief package may be appropriate. However, there are strong disagreements on the scope and content of the current relief package, which should be deliberated and debated through regular committee order,” writes Crapo. “We have the opportunity to work together to get this right. That is what we should be doing, especially right now.”

We could all use some accountability and more COVID relief that could find support across party lines. Just like its proper for the newly approved Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack to evaluate funds utilized in CFAP and the Farmers to Families Food Box program, it’s also right for taxpayers to know where and how funds under previous COVID relief measures have been spent and for what priorities.

Because as Ernst says, “This isn’t monopoly money. This is real money. We have a moral obligation to future generations to spend responsibly.”

Hide comments
account-default-image

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish