Big farm-related tax changes proposed by Republicans, TrumpBig farm-related tax changes proposed by Republicans, Trump
From estate taxes to capital gains and cost recovery, House Republicans and President-elect Donald Trump are floating proposals to make significant changes to tax provisions important to farmers.
January 10, 2017
From estate taxes to capital gains and cost recovery, House Republicans and President-elect Donald Trump are floating proposals to make significant changes to tax provisions important to farmers and ranchers.
During the 2017 American Farm Bureau Federation Annual Convention, tax experts discussed the impact of potential tax changes for those involved in agriculture, according to a AFBF press release.
Both House Republicans and the president-elect have proposed eliminating estate taxes. However, while the House Republicans haven’t said anything about stepped-up basis—an essential provision for farmers and ranchers—Trump would do away with stepped-up basis for estates over $10 million. Trump would also subject transfers at death to the capital gains tax, with protections for small businesses.
“We’re quick to say, ‘Repeal the estate tax.’ But if they impose the capital gains tax where the estate tax would be, then you’ve really just replaced one tax with another. It’s still a transfer tax,” said Brennis Craddock, CPA, chief operating officer of Tennessee Farm Bureau’s Farmers Service Inc. Craddock was joined on the panel by Pat Wolff, AFBF senior director of congressional relations.
Changes to provisions related to cost-recovery, like Section 179 expensing and depreciation, and interest deductions could be problematic for farmers and ranchers, Wolff and Craddock cautioned.
Wolff also gave farmers a heads-up about a possible new tax—border adjustability—under which taxes on income would be determined by whether or not the income passes over the U.S. border.
“Another way to think about it is that revenue is taxed where it’s consumed, not where it’s generated. That means under the Republican proposal there would be a 20 percent tax on all imported products. For any products that are sold overseas, there would be no income tax,” Wolff said.
“It would make U.S. exports cheaper, but some goods you might purchase from foreign companies, like fertilizer or equipment, would have the 20 percent tax,” Wolff said, emphasizing that AFBF does not have policy addressing this aspect of the tax proposal.
Good or bad for farmers and ranchers, congressional action on taxes is likely—and it’s not too far off, Wolff said.
“If you hear something today you like or something you don’t, you should call your members of Congress. Tax reform is front and center in Congress,” she said.
Expected this spring, the House Republicans’ tax package will likely be put through Congress via the budget reconciliation process. On the upside, this approach ensures the package will be protected from a filibuster. On the downside, it will limit lawmakers to a 10-year package, which is problematic for farmers and ranchers who rely on tax code consistency to plan properly.
About the Author(s)
You May Also Like
Current Conditions for
Enter a zip code to see the weather conditions for a different location.
This Week in Agribusiness, Dec. 9, 2023Dec 08, 2023
FFA Tribute: Caleb HorneDec 08, 2023
Grains face modest end-of-week cutsJan 18, 2023
USDA issues minor cuts to 2023/24 Brazil soybean cropDec 08, 2023