Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: MN

Minnesota investigates rise in dicamba damage complaints

TAGS: Crops
Bruce Potter soybean plants with dicamba damage
DICAMBA DAMAGE: Reports are up on dicamba damage in Minnesota after a two-year decline. Complaints have mostly come from the southwestern portion of the state.
The state ag department has received 76 complaints of alleged dicamba damage as of July 14.

As of July 14, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has received 76 complaints alleging crop damage caused by the herbicide dicamba.

Josh Stamper, MDA’s director of pesticide and fertilizer management division, says about two-thirds of the complaints received since June 20 requested the department to conduct formal investigations. Complaint numbers had been on the decline over the last couple years after MDA established a June 20 cutoff date for spraying dicamba on dicamba-tolerant soybeans.

In 2017, MDA received its highest number of reports alleging dicamba drift damage — 253. Of that number, 55 were formal complaints requesting investigations. Overall, those reports impacted an estimated 265,000 acres.

For the 2018 growing season, MDA established the June 20 cutoff date and the number of complaints dropped dramatically to 53 reports, of which 29 were formal complaints. Just over 1,800 acres were impacted that year.

In 2019, report numbers were down to 22, impacting approximately 760 acres.

“Southwest Minnesota tends to be the hot spot, particularly Jackson County,” Stamper says, when asked where most of the complaints are located. Crop consultants reportedly saw widespread dicamba damage in non-dicamba-tolerant soybeans.

MDA is using an unmanned aerial vehicle mounted with a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) camera to view crops from above and to generate biomass maps. The less vegetative mass seen represents sites where potential dicamba damage was done. NDVU also helps determine if the dicamba damage was caused by drift or applicator error. The latter shows up as a more uniform pattern in the field.

Stamper says multiple factors could contribute to dicamba damage in other crops. Label requirements for application are complex, and conditions during application can be challenging.

“A lot of folks do it right and have no problem,” he says.

Yet, he has concern that some might have forgotten lessons learned about dicamba use years ago, such as not applying it on corn during late season growth.

Visit MDA online to learn more about dicamba, or to file a dicamba damage complaint.

Hide comments
account-default-image

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish