is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist

Observant readers catch editor’s error

I stand corrected!

In a recent commentary about picking cotton—actually about my mother picking cotton since I was of little use in the endeavor, being only four or five years old at the time—I was guilty of a math error.

Actually, I was guilty of an oversight error. I failed to note that the amount of cotton my mother picked, 200 pounds in one day, was not what the gin would have paid for. Turnout would have been considerably less than the pounds she picked and tied up in that cotton sheet at the end of the day.

I was reminded of that shortly after the latest issue of Southwest Farm Press began arriving in mailboxes. And it was suggested that I make a correction as soon as possible so that people would not think me some sort of buffoon. Well, some people probably think that anyway, but if we can prevent that sentiment from spreading, all the better.

One gentleman noted that we share the same last name and quipped that perhaps the name Smith could be sullied if I let the error stand. I am, therefore, admitting my error and correcting the mistake, with help from observant readers, one of whom offered further insight: “200 pounds of hand-picked cotton has to go through the process of being ginned and seed removed,” wrote Larry Helms.

He said turnout normally ranges from 25 percent to 35 percent. So 200 pounds of hand-picked cotton turns into approximately 60 pounds of marketable cotton for the farmer. At 33 cents a pound in 1953, that would be $19, less gin charges. 

“Best I remember we got 50 cents per 100 pounds for hand-pulling cotton in 1953,” Helms said. “I was 5 years old at the time. At 200 pounds a day, that would yield $1 to the picker.”

I checked with my mom recently and she recalls being paid about $2 a day for picking cotton, which, she said, was a pretty good fee at the time. She also said she probably never picked as much as 200 pounds in a day, but I like to give her the benefit of the doubt. She was quite certain that I did not pick 50 cents worth of cotton.

Mr. Helms said 2,000 pounds of hand- or machine-picked cotton turns into approximately a 500- pound marketable bale. “Before ginning charges, at 33 cents-a-pound, that comes to $165. In 2009, we sold our cotton for about 55 cents a pound, $275 per bale, which is only $110 more than it was in 1953. I wonder why I got into this business sometimes!” 

I am happy to report that the responses to my cotton-picking story, even the ones pointing out the error, were good humored and absent any malice. I also would like to remind readers that I do occasionally make mistakes and can always count on your sharp eyes to ferret them out. I always appreciate the feedback.

Thanks for reading.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.