Farm Progress

Foliar fungicide decision tough one for cotton

Ron Smith 1, Senior Content Director

March 4, 2010

2 Min Read

Deciding whether to apply a fungicide on cotton fields to control foliar diseases is a tough choice. Research shows that fungicides will control such diseases as wet weather blight, cotton leafspots and others, and field trials show a slight yield advantage.

“It’s frustrating,” says Bob Kemerait, University of Georgia Extension specialist. “We know we can control the diseases, but does it make a difference?”

Kemerait discussed cotton diseases and fungicide options during the cotton consultant’s conference at the Beltwide Cotton Conferences last month in New Orleans.

He said fungicides like Quadris or Headline show some yield advantage when applied to control foliar diseases. “But the increase is not statistically significant. Farmers get about 100 pounds per acre advantage. We don’t yet know the potential for fungicide application. What can we afford to apply even if we know we can absolutely control the diseases? We’re trying to come up with better answers. Currently, we’re not recommending fungicide applications.”

He said a 100-pound per acre yield increase, however, could convince farmers to apply fungicides, especially with the recent outbreak of leafspot diseases across the Southeast.

Kemerait said seed treatment for seedling diseases is another matter and farmers typically use at least the base treatment that comes on the seed. That may not be enough for some situations, however. And seed treatments may not provide the residual control farmers can expect from in-furrow fungicide applications.

“Seed treatments have become popular,” he said. “It’s convenient. In-furrow applications have declined.”

Rhizoctonia is the No. 1 cotton seedling disease across the Cotton Belt, Kemerait said. The base seed treatment may not be enough to control the disease. “In hot zones the base treatment is not as effective as the newer seed treatments.”

He said in a worst case scenario, fungicide efficiency may decline. “The choice of product may make a difference and with the extra treatment farmers can expect a better stand and better yield. If growers are going into poor planting conditions and using a lower seeding rate they may need additional protection. ”

He said in-furrow treatments may do as well as or better than seed treatments, “but growers are moving away from those applications.”

email: [email protected]

About the Author(s)

Ron Smith 1

Senior Content Director, Farm Press/Farm Progress

Ron Smith has spent more than 40 years covering Sunbelt agriculture. Ron began his career in agricultural journalism as an Experiment Station and Extension editor at Clemson University, where he earned a Masters Degree in English in 1975. He served as associate editor for Southeast Farm Press from 1978 through 1989. In 1990, Smith helped launch Southern Turf Management Magazine and served as editor. He also helped launch two other regional Turf and Landscape publications and launched and edited Florida Grove and Vegetable Management for the Farm Press Group. Within two years of launch, the turf magazines were well-respected, award-winning publications. Ron has received numerous awards for writing and photography in both agriculture and landscape journalism. He is past president of The Turf and Ornamental Communicators Association and was chosen as the first media representative to the University of Georgia College of Agriculture Advisory Board. He was named Communicator of the Year for the Metropolitan Atlanta Agricultural Communicators Association. More recently, he was awarded the Norman Borlaug Lifetime Achievement Award by the Texas Plant Protection Association. Smith also worked in public relations, specializing in media relations for agricultural companies. Ron lives with his wife Pat in Johnson City, Tenn. They have two grown children, Stacey and Nick, and three grandsons, Aaron, Hunter and Walker.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like