March 7, 2013
Sen. Jeff Flake, Arizona Republican, said yesterday, "The crop insurance program has turned into a huge taxpayer-funded boon for some of the biggest, multi-national insurance companies and multi-millionaire farmers. In a time of record deficits and an incomprehensible $16.5 trillion in debt, this program can no longer be justified in its current form."
In response, Sen. Flake is introducing legislation that will save taxpayers $40.1 billion by "reducing" federal crop insurance premium subsidies. It was introduced in Washington yesterday as the Crop Insurance Subsidy Reduction Act (S. 446) in order to significantly reduce the amount of taxpayer dollars used to subsidize crop insurance. S. 446 returns federal crop insurance premium subsidies to their pre-Agriculture Risk Protection Act (ARPA) levels. Basically the new proposal being presented in Congress want to increase the farmer’s share of the premium from 38% to 62% of the premium.
I should also note Republican Rep. John Duncan of Tennessee, has introduced a similar consumer tax savings bill. To say they are gunning for this program is an"understatement. My argument is, sure the government paid out billions to pay for crop insurance claims, but with 80% of the nations farmers participating and paying big premiums, how much would we have had to pay out as a nation if there was no insurance? You can't tell me billions in disaster aid would not have been paid out following one of hottest, driest summers ever on record! It was a national disaster or huge proportions. Hurricane Katrina cost the county billions and billions, and there was no "hurricane insurance" being paid into the government by the people of New Orleans who ran around in the streets looting businesses following the disaster... Still the government paid out billions!
My guess is as the politicians in Washington attempt to "fix" another problem, they will only create one that is much more dangerous, i.e."gun control, distribution of wealth, social security, medicare, medicaid, etc... Before long we they will be trying to discourage U.S. farming, like we did with U.S. energy production years back. Then we will be held captive to foreign crop production, like we have been held captive to foreign oil. Hope this isn't how it goes down, but as you know they generally take aim at those standing atop the financial hill. As those in the ag industry make more money, I suspect the powers that be in Washington will continue to look for ways to pull back their reins.
For the rest of the story including more insight into what traders believe are influencing market prices currently, sign-up here to receive a free 30-Day trial of my daily Grain and Livestock commentary. If you are looking to be educated and not just told what to do, simply click here and get started!
About the Author(s)
You May Also Like
Current Conditions for
Enter a zip code to see the weather conditions for a different location.
This Week in Agribusiness, Dec. 9, 2023Dec 08, 2023
FFA Tribute: Caleb HorneDec 08, 2023
Grains face modest end-of-week cutsJan 18, 2023
USDA issues minor cuts to 2023/24 Brazil soybean cropDec 08, 2023