Nebraska Farmer Logo

Next steps for Nebraska pulse crop checkoff

Growers aren't sure whether to join the national coalition, but legislation to create a state checkoff is in the works.

Tyler Harris, Editor

August 23, 2019

3 Min Read
Western Nebraska farmer Rol Rushman discusses the path forward for a new pulse crop checkoff at a workshop and field day in G
NEW CHECKOFF: Western Nebraska farmer Rol Rushman discusses the path forward for a new pulse crop checkoff at a workshop and field day in Grant, Neb. Tyler Harris

With the increase in pulse crop production in Nebraska over the past few years, is it time for pulse crop growers to have their own checkoff?

As of 2017, the combined acreage of yellow field peas, lentils and chickpeas in Nebraska reached an estimated 80,000 acres. Meanwhile, the state has seen a growth in processors handling field peas and other pulse crops.

Strahinja Stepanovic, Nebraska Extension educator, has pointed out that a pulse crop checkoff could be one way to keep the industry moving forward. Last year, Stepanovic sent out a survey to gauge support for a possible pulse crop checkoff in the state.

This year, he followed up with another survey, and he notes the results were virtually identical.

"Over two-thirds of the farmers surveyed supported the checkoff," Stepanovic says. "However, there are areas where growers disagree on how to move forward."

Perhaps the biggest point of debate is whether the state checkoff would join the National Pulse Growers Coalition, a group administrated by the USA Dry Pea and Lentil Council/American Pulse Association.

This also would provide major benefits, giving growers access to revenue protection insurance, which includes projected prices set for each pulse crop — for both organic and conventional — by the national program. However, the debate lies in how assessments are made — joining the national coalition requires assessments be made on a percentage basis.

"If you want to join the national coalition, the state checkoff must pay a percentage-based assessment, and it has to be at least 1% [of net pulse crop sales from first purchasers in the state] in order to get revenue insurance," Stepanovic says.

In addition, the state checkoff would have to pay an annual membership fee — a minimum of $10,000. If the state checkoff decides to remain independent, it can choose to set the assessment at a lower percentage, base it on the number of bushels sold or use another form of funding.

"That's where most of the growers disagree," Stepanovic adds. "The growers that want to have revenue insurance, they support a percentage-based assessment, but some growers want to go with a weight-based system [an assessment based on pounds of product sold] because it's more familiar, and in many cases means a lower payment. But in that case, you can't join the national coalition."

"I think growers do want to join the national coalition for revenue protection," says Rol Rushman, who grows field peas on his farm near Gurley, Neb. "The only thing that's really changed is overall enthusiasm for peas in general right now, because the price has gone down to about $4.80 per bushel in North Dakota markets. Right now, overall, farmer sentiment is pretty low."

However, he notes, a big step was taken recently when the Nebraska Dry Bean Commission agreed to allow chickpea growers, which historically have been a part of the Dry Bean Commission, to be included in the pulse crop checkoff.

"I thought that was a pretty big step in getting them on board with chickpeas," Rushman says. "It will definitely help better represent the number of pea acres in Nebraska."

Currently, pulse growers are working with Nebraska state senators on drafting legislation to establish the pulse crop checkoff. They also are reaching out to the national coalition for help in drafting the language of the bill.

While the bill ideally will be ready by the start of the 2020 legislative session in January, Rushman also is hoping to give additional growers a chance to offer input.

"I think it should be brought to the legislature at the start of the session in January," Rushman says. "That's the goal at the moment — to draft legislation properly. All the pieces are in place now."

Rushman encourages growers interested in creating a pulse crop checkoff to contact him at [email protected] with any questions or suggestions for the checkoff.

About the Author(s)

Tyler Harris

Editor, Wallaces Farmer

Tyler Harris is the editor for Wallaces Farmer. He started at Farm Progress as a field editor, covering Missouri, Kansas and Iowa. Before joining Farm Progress, Tyler got his feet wet covering agriculture and rural issues while attending the University of Iowa, taking any chance he could to get outside the city limits and get on to the farm. This included working for Kalona News, south of Iowa City in the town of Kalona, followed by an internship at Wallaces Farmer in Des Moines after graduation.

Coming from a farm family in southwest Iowa, Tyler is largely interested in how issues impact people at the producer level. True to the reason he started reporting, he loves getting out of town and meeting with producers on the farm, which also gives him a firsthand look at how agriculture and urban interact.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like