Farm Progress

Study shows cover crops could offset negative effects of residue removal

UNL study shows late termination of cover crops can offset increased water erosion potential resulting from residue removal.

Tyler Harris

March 23, 2017

3 Min Read
COVER CROP POTENTIAL: The study demonstrated that with 100% residue removal, erosion potential increased by about 27% at the rain-fed site. This increase was, however, offset by the late cover crop termination, thanks to an increased size in water stable aggregates at this site.Humberto Blanco

It's an often-asked question in Nebraska and other Corn Belt states: How much corn residue can I remove without negatively impacting soil health? Recently, with cover crops added to the mix, there's a new dynamic added to that question.

"The revolving question is, can we use cover crops to offset the negative effects of corn residue removal on soil properties?" says Sabrina Ruis, postdoctoral research associate at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

A recent study conducted by Ruis, along with Humberto Blanco, UNL associate professor of agronomy, aimed to answer this question. This study, funded by the Nebraska Environmental Trust, took place over the 2014, 2015 and 2016 cropping seasons at two sites — one rain-fed site at the UNL Rogers Memorial Farm east of Lincoln, and one irrigated at the UNL South Central Ag Lab near Clay Center. Both sites are continuous no-till corn.

The study included treatments with different amounts of corn residue removal at 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% removal. The study also evaluated cover crop termination dates. In both locations, a cereal rye cover crop was planted after corn harvest in late October to early November, and was terminated at two different dates — early termination about 30 days prior to corn planting, and late termination at or around the corn planting date in late April or early May. A control with no cover crop was also used.

As expected, late-termination cover crops yielded greater biomass than those terminated 30 days prior to planting. However, cover crop biomass yield also increased with higher rates of residue removal.

Ruis also measured the size of water-stable soil aggregates to evaluate changes in soil structural quality and water erosion potential. With 100% residue removal, erosion potential increased by about 27% at the rain-fed site. This increase was, however, offset by the late cover crop termination, thanks to an increased size in water-stable aggregates at this site.

Although corn yields in 2015 saw an 8% yield reduction at both sites following late termination of cover crops, the other two years saw no impact on subsequent corn crop yield.

"We would have expected a negative impact from late-termination cover crops on corn yield because they were using water that would otherwise be in the system for primary crop, but the late termination only reduced yield in one of the three years by about 8% at both sites," says Ruis. "Early cover crop termination was similar to the control as far as effect on yield and water erosion potential, because those cover crops are so small when they're terminated that they haven't had much time to grow and impact soil properties."

Starting last spring, Ruis has been evaluating greenhouse gas fluxes in the soil in different treatments —including carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane — and plans to continue evaluating these fluxes through midsummer. Data will help with understanding biological activity in the soils and losses of soil carbon and nitrogen to the atmosphere.

This spring she plans to conduct a detailed analysis on wind erosion potential in addition to continuing her research on water erosion potential.

She'll also be monitoring long-term changes in soil organic carbon. Because this is a short-term study, Ruis notes there haven't been significant effects on soil organic carbon, although there was a trend for residue removal reducing the amount of soil organic carbon, and later cover crop termination tending to increase this soil property. "Later on down the road could we see differences?" she asks. "Over the last three years, there weren't any significant changes, but we expect to see changes in soil organic carbon in the long-term due to continued residue removal."

To learn more about this study, contact Ruis at [email protected].

About the Author(s)

Tyler Harris

Editor, Wallaces Farmer

Tyler Harris is the editor for Wallaces Farmer. He started at Farm Progress as a field editor, covering Missouri, Kansas and Iowa. Before joining Farm Progress, Tyler got his feet wet covering agriculture and rural issues while attending the University of Iowa, taking any chance he could to get outside the city limits and get on to the farm. This included working for Kalona News, south of Iowa City in the town of Kalona, followed by an internship at Wallaces Farmer in Des Moines after graduation.

Coming from a farm family in southwest Iowa, Tyler is largely interested in how issues impact people at the producer level. True to the reason he started reporting, he loves getting out of town and meeting with producers on the farm, which also gives him a firsthand look at how agriculture and urban interact.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like


Aug 29 - Aug 31, 2023
Farm Progress Show annually hosts more than 600 exhibitors displaying new farm equipment, tractors, combines and farm implements; seed and crop protection products; and many additional farm supplies and services.
LEARN MORE