indiana Prairie Farmer Logo

Which corn input can you leave out?

Corn Illustrated: A unique study indicates that eliminating any piece of your best corn production system could cost money, even with tighter margins.

Tom J. Bechman, Editor, Indiana Prairie Farmer

April 4, 2023

3 Min Read
Planter equipped with solid rubber closing wheels on soybean splitter rows
EVERY PRACTICE MATTERS: This planter is still equipped with solid rubber closing wheels on soybean splitter rows, but the operator switched to aftermarket wheels on corn rows in search of more uniform stands.Tom J. Bechman

You’ve developed a system that kicks out respectable corn yields and profits year in and year out. Then this year comes along, and your corn budget indicates profit margins could be tighter. Should you cut expense out of your budget by eliminating an input or switching to a cheaper option? If you trim the budget, will yields hold steady, or are you gambling on sacrificing yield to save money upfront?

If you’re trying to answer these types of questions, look at what Beck’s found in one of its Practical Farm Research studies in 2022.

“We called it an omission study,” explains Steve Gauck, a regional agronomy manger for Beck’s, based near Greensburg, Ind. “We took a proven system and focused on four practices that were PFR Proven. That means each was tested at multiple locations for three years, and produced a yield increase each year with an average net profit increase.

“So, here, we compared the full system against the same recipe, missing one of the four PFR Proven practices each time. The variable was a missing practice.”

This study was repeated at four Beck’s PFR locations: central Illinois, central Iowa, Ohio and Minnesota. Then results were averaged together.

Corn system results

The four successful strategies were:

1. plant in a timely window, between April 27 and May 7

2. trade out two solid rubber closing wheels for two Yetter Twister poly closing wheels

3. split nitrogen application, with 60 pounds per acre of liquid N at planting and 130 pounds per acre sidedressed at V3 vs. 190 pounds of UAN at V3

4. traditional fungicide application of 7 ounces per acre of Veltyma vs. no fungicide

The proven system averaged 212 bushels per acre across all four locations. Corn was priced at $6.11 per bushel, UAN cost $1.04 per unit, and Veltyma was $414.95 per gallon.

Later planting date. Planting between May 16 and May 31 vs. the earlier window dropped yield to 208.5 bushels per acre. It produced $21.39 per acre less net income.

Solid rubber closing wheels. Yield was off 2.3 bushels per acre and net income was down by $14.05 per acre compared to the proven system. That’s comparable with how solid rubber wheels have compared before, Gauck notes. Sometimes, the yield drop and cost for staying with solid rubber wheels is even higher.

Single N application. Yield slipped 2.8 bushels per acre on average, with lower net income off $17.11 per acre. The same amount of nitrogen was applied on all plots. The only difference was that no N was applied at planting in this plot.

No fungicide. Skipping the fungicide application caused the biggest yield drop, at 5 bushels per acre. However, since fungicide was the most expensive practice changed or omitted, net income was off the least compared to the control, at $7.86 per acre.

Bottom line

Going away from the system proven over time resulted in a yield loss ranging from 2.3 to 5 bushels per acre, Gauck says. It reduced net income in a range from $7.86 to $21.39 per acre.

“If you have confidence in your system, stay with it,” Gauck concludes. “Changing it to gamble on saving a few dollars could prove unwise.”

About the Author(s)

Tom J. Bechman

Editor, Indiana Prairie Farmer, Farm Progress

Tom J. Bechman is editor of Indiana Prairie Farmer. He joined Farm Progress in 1981 as a field editor, first writing stories to help farmers adjust to a difficult harvest after a tough weather year. His goal today is the same — writing stories that help farmers adjust to a changing environment in a profitable manner.

Bechman knows about Indiana agriculture because he grew up on a small dairy farm and worked with young farmers as a vocational agriculture teacher and FFA advisor before joining Farm Progress. He works closely with Purdue University specialists, Indiana Farm Bureau and commodity groups to cover cutting-edge issues affecting farmers. He specializes in writing crop stories with a focus on obtaining the highest and most economical yields possible.

Tom and his wife, Carla, have four children: Allison, Ashley, Daniel and Kayla, plus eight grandchildren. They raise produce for the food pantry and house 4-H animals for the grandkids on their small acreage near Franklin, Ind.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like