Farm Progress

Water remains the lifeblood of California’s almond industry. California water policy is incredibly complex, driven by intense competition among very diverse interests.

October 3, 2013

4 Min Read
<p> Decreasing reliance on the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta is one of the goals set by the Delta Vision Task Force.</p>

It is a simple but vitally important fact: Water availability is of critical importance to California almond growers and handlers. Water remains the lifeblood of California’s almond industry, which in 2012 produced 2 billion pounds of almonds valued at $4.3 billion. That said, California water policy is incredibly complex, driven by intense competition among very diverse interests.

The Almond Board of California has stepped up its efforts to bring clarity to water issues of interest to growers and handlers. This article marks the first in an occasional series designed to lay out the scope of water issues having the most direct impact on the industry, while providing a solid basis for understanding the broad array of solutions being proposed.

Water System History

California’s present water resource system was conceived and constructed in the mid 20th century, and focused almost exclusively on resource extraction for human economic purposes. Into the 21st century, California’s natural resource policies have increasingly shifted to a focus on sustainability of natural resources, and the restoration or enhancement of the environment. Not surprisingly, the physical systems that were conceived under extraction policies in the 20th century are increasingly in conflict with society’s 21st century environmental and economic goals and/or values.

The water supply picture for producing California almonds is highly dependent on which region of the state a grower/handler is located. The farther north the acreage, the greater the likelihood water supplies will be generally dependable, even secure. The farther south the acreage, the greater the likelihood water supply availability will be less reliable, subject to higher uncertainty due to water-year type, competing interests and environmental regulatory constraints. Where supplies are fairly secure, the temptation arises to ask the question, “Why should I care about water supply in the rest of the state?”

Public Trust Doctrine

The debate over California’s water resources centers on what is or will constitute a beneficial use of available water supplies. There is a legal term, “public trust doctrine,” that surfaces often. This is the principle that certain resources should be preserved for public use, and the government is the party required to maintain them for the public’s reasonable use. There is limited consensus on what constitutes a legally enforceable “public trust resource” or how it will eventually be appropriated. The legislature has avoided defining it. Regardless, the public trust doctrine ideals will certainly come into play in future debates. How this will ultimately interact with water rights law is unclear, but it certainly has significant potential impacts to almond growers, handlers and agriculture in general.

Recent legislation produced a package of laws called the Delta Reform Act of 2009, which sought to gain “balance” in water resource use throughout the state. The Act focuses heavily on a “coequal” state policy of 1) seeking and achieving water supply reliability and 2) restoring/enhancing ecosystem health.These policy bookends are a direct representation of the shift in societal values toward more sustainable, environmentally friendly practices, coupled with the continuing reality of providing reliable water supplies for human use and economic prosperity.

Decisions Based on Credible Data

In 2006, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger formed by executive order the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force, which was tasked with producing goals, ideals and a strategic plan by which water resources ought to be viewed, and thus governed. This Task Force identified certain values/principles/priorities by which they believed any decisions on California’s water resources should be predicated on the future.

Among the priorities developed by the Task Force were such things as:

• Improving local self-sufficiency,

• Decreased reliance on the Delta,

• Integration of all water resources within a region and among regions,

• Sustainable practices,

• Conservation measures, and

• Water use/reuse/multiple-use strategies.

More recent considerations have added these priorities:

• Based on scientifically sound practices and data, and

• Operated under “adaptive management” approaches utilizing responsive and flexible structures, policies and strategies.

All these approaches necessitate gathering and analyzing massive amounts of real-time, circumstantial data for effective real-time decision making.

The Delta Vision Task Force went further and recommended the construction of a dual conveyance system; changes and additions/modifications to current conveyance systems and storage facilities; and development of a thorough analysis and plan concerning all stressors affecting supply.

At present, there are many policy-related efforts underway, seeking to address California’s water needs now and into the future. Inherent in all these efforts are upsides and downsides to all interests and constituencies. As projects/strategies are contemplated, the values of balance, beneficial-use determinations and efficiencies will play heavily in the outcome of deliberations. Costs continue to be a crucial factor, not to mention the question of who will pay for improvements.

Almond producers/handlers have a major stake in the outcome, particularly the potential impacts and the associated costs of any of these efforts addressing California’s water supply allocation and distribution.


More from Western Farm Press

Water quality regulations costly to growers

One honey heist to rule them all

Big Thompson crop creating confusion

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like