Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: IN

Manage Twin-Row Corn Plots With New Technology

Manage Twin-Row Corn Plots With New Technology
Changing rates from the cab makes plot more practical.

Roger and Nick Wenning, Greensburg, put out a twin-row corn plot for the second year in a row. Their goal isn't to compare twin rows to standard 30-inch rows – they're already convinced twin rows stand a better shot of higher yields. They plant all of their corn in twin rows with a Great Plains planter.

Instead, their goal is to determine which hybrids work best in twin rows, and at what populations. A number of seed companies sent representatives and seed when they planted the plot a few days ago to get their entries included. Boxes had to be emptied and new seed put in after each round. It's a 6-row planter, but since it's twin rows, it meant emptying and refilling 12 boxes each time.

Twin-row frenzy: Several seed reps brought seed and came to help plant Roger and Nick Wenning's twin-row test plot that compares hybrids at two populations.

One thing Nick didn't have to do that he did a year ago was manually change the seeding rate. He plants each hybrid in one pass at a lower population, in the high 30,000 seeds per acre range, and one at about 45,000 seeds per acre. A year ago he had to get out of the tractor cab, walk back to the planter and make the changes each time.

This year driving a somewhat newer, larger tractor better equipped to handle the planter, he also had automatic controls within the cab. He could adjust planting rate at each end of the field so that he didn't have to spend time and frustration manually changing rates.

The Wennings also didn't plant the entire length of the field, since one end starts to roll. They planted that corn to bulk corn instead. Their idea was to keep the comparisons as fair for everyone as possible. The soil type wasn't 100% uniform, but it was much more uniform that if they had planted the entire length of the field, and then combined the entire length of the field for yield comparisons next fall.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.