Crops are vulnerable to a changing climate. They can succumb to many threats that are likely to get worse in the next century.

An international group of researchers set out to test how to help crops adapt in the coming decades. Their idea is to use wild crop relatives.

These cousins of domestic crops look like weeds and you have probably walked past them when hiking on mountain trails. You may have even seen them in the cracks of pavement in the cities. They have lived in harsh climates without any human help since the dawn of time.

Scientists hope that using crop wild relatives in breeding programs can add resilience to domestic crops.

“Crop wild relatives have been selected by nature over millennia to withstand the very climatic stresses that we are trying to address, and hence present a new hope,” says Filippo Bassi. Bassi is a scientist in Morocco at the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas.

But it can be risky to change how breeders work. “Before making the final decision to shift investments from normal breeding to the use of crop wild relatives, it is critical to make sure that there is a real advantage in doing so,” Bassi says.

To test this idea, Bassi’s international team of scientists, coming from Africa, Europe, Asia and South America, focused on durum wheat.

The team gathered 60 unique varieties of wheat to expose to a battery of harsh tests. These included fungal diseases, drought and high temperatures. One-third of the wheat lines the team used were developed by combining wild relatives of wheat with strong, commercial varieties.

These wild relative-derived varieties of wheat were robust compared to more conventional varieties. About a third of wild relative varieties were resistant to the fungal disease Septoria, compared to just a tenth of the others. But conventional wheat varieties were more resistant to other diseases, like leaf rust, that have been the focus of past breeding programs.

Where the wild relative wheat varieties really shone was under drought and heat stress. During drought, the wild relative lines had larger grains, a critical adaptation and market trait for this crop. And, when the nutrient nitrogen was in short supply, the wild-derived lines produced a higher yield than the other wheat varieties.

“In the case of temperature, the crop wild relative presented a clear advantage with a yield increase of 42% under heat stress,” says Bassi. “Yield losses to heat can be drastic, and the use of crop wild relatives to breed new varieties appears to be a very strategic approach to address this climatic challenge.”

But resilience isn’t the whole story. Crops are different from their wild cousins in large part because humans have selected crops over many centuries to adapt to their needs, including a preference for making delicious foods.

That is why Bassi’s team also looked at the usefulness of the 60 wheat varieties for making pasta. Here, the wild-derived wheat lines were the least suitable for pasta making. “That’s a disappointment,” says Bassi. “But not a deal breaker.”

“This does not prove that the use of crop wild relatives will inevitably result in poor industrial quality,” says Bassi. “But rather that it is important for breeders to be aware of this risk and develop breeding strategies that address this issue.”

Overall, durum wheat’s wild relatives appeared useful. When crossed to elite commercial varieties, they provided increased resistance to heat, drought and some diseases. These are precisely the threats facing not just durum wheat, but most major crops in a warming world. That’s good news for plant breeders — and the public.

“The crop wild relatives showed great promise in terms of climate change adaptation,” says Bassi. “I hope the public will be re-assured that breeders are testing all possible opportunities to prepare agriculture for climate challenges.”

Sources: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Crop Science Society of America, which is solely responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.