American Agriculturist Logo

Answering your questions on Syngenta settlement

Legal Notes: Growers should begin hearing soon how much they will be eligible for under the settlement.

Paul Goeringer

August 22, 2019

3 Min Read
Close up of gavel
LEGAL WRANGLING: Several attorneys are currently appealing the final Syngenta settlement order, arguing that the judge did not have the authority to invalidate contingent fee agreements. Zolnierek/Getty Images

Many of you have asked about the release of potential Syngenta settlement checks to growers.

The settlement checks should have happened earlier this year, but it has not happened yet. I am taking this opportunity to address many of the questions I get in relation to the settlement and what the latest information is:

What led to this settlement?

In 2010, Syngenta was approved to begin selling seeds containing the MIR162 genetic event. Syngenta started selling the MIR162 in 2011 in Agrisure Duracade and Agrisure Viptera corn varieties. The Chinese government had yet to approve MIR162, but in 2013 MIR162 appeared in shipments to China. 

The Chinese began to reject shipments of U.S. corn based on this, and the price of corn dropped based on these rejections. 

Producers who did not grow the MIR162 genetic event began to file lawsuits against Syngenta. A judicial panel combined the lawsuits into one federal district court case, and in late 2016 the court granted class certification for nine classes of producers. Syngenta eventually agreed to a settlement in 2018.

What are some details on the settlement?

In late 2018, the court approved the settlement for $1.51 billion. The settlement includes all U.S. corn farmers, including those who opted out of the original class-action suit and those who grew Agrisure Duracade and Agrisure Viptera. The settlement will also include landlords who based rental rates on yield or price, such as a flex lease based on yield or price, or a crop share lease. 

Fixed-cash landlords are not eligible to participate. The period included in the settlement is Sept. 15, 2013, through the 2018 crop year. 

The settlement will include four classes:

Class 1. Growers and eligible landlords who did not use Duracade or Viptera will receive a minimum of $1.44 billion.

Class 2. Growers and eligible landlords who did use Duracade or Viptera will be limited to $22.6 million.

Class 3. Grain handlers will be limited to $29.9 million.

Class 4. Ethanol producers will be limited to $19.5 million.

As a part of the settlement, the court set aside just over $503 million for attorneys’ fees. A later order clarified that the attorneys’ fees should be divided up by the following percentages:

  • 49% to pool for Kansas multidistrict litigation attorneys

  • 23.5% to pool for Minnesota state court attorneys

  • 15.5% to pool for Illinois state court attorneys

  • 12% to individually retained private attorneys

The settlement invalidates many of the contingent fee agreements, where attorneys would collect a percentage of amounts recovered by their clients in the settlement.

What is going on with the settlement right now?

Several individual attorneys are currently appealing the final order, arguing that the judge did not have the authority to invalidate the contingent fee agreements. At the same time, other appeals are ongoing from class members who feel the final settlement is not fair.

How much money could a corn grower expect to see out of the settlement?

The amount each corn grower could expect is unknown at this time. Estimates do exist out there, but they are probably not accurate. This settlement includes thousands of eligible growers and landlords with unknown production from 2013 to 2018. 

With too many unknowns currently, any estimate on a settlement amount is a guess.

When can we expect to see checks go out to corn growers?

Checks were originally expected to go out in the second quarter of this year based on the settlement agreement, but that has not happened due to the ongoing appeals. Recent posts on cornseedsettlement.com, the dedicated website set up to give growers information about the settlement, show that class members should expect to see class determinations go out soon that will show their compensable recovery quantity.

Goeringer is an Extension legal specialist with the University of Maryland’s Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

About the Author(s)

Paul Goeringer

Paul Goeringer specializes in legal risk management as it relates to agriculture. Prior to coming to AREC, Paul worked at the University of Arkansas where his legal research was focused in the areas of environmental compliance, right-to-farm laws, agricultural leasing laws, contracting issues, federal farm program compliance, recreational use and agritourism issues, and estate planning issues in agriculture. Through this research Paul developed educational materials to better help Arkansas’s agricultural producers understand and manage legal risks in their operations. Since joining AREC, Paul has worked with county extension educators to begin to fill the void in the areas of agricultural leasing and legal issues in estate planning. Paul is also looking at modifying his existing research in the areas of environmental compliance, right-to-farm laws, and federal farm program compliance to benefit Maryland’s farmers. Paul is a graduate of Oklahoma State University with a B.S. in Agricultural Economics, the University of Oklahoma with a Juris Doctorate, and the University of Arkansas with an LL.M. in Agricultural Law and an M.S. in Agricultural Economics. Paul is licensed to practice law in Oklahoma and is a member of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the American Agricultural Law Association, the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, and the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like