Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: United States
Residue from a cover crop and reduced tillage improves soils says a Texas AgriLife agronomist
<p>Residue from a cover crop and reduced tillage improves soils, says a Texas AgriLife agronomist.</p>

Better soil health: Reduced tillage, rotation, and cover crops

Cover crops, rotation and reduced tillage improve moisture infiltration in soils. Adding carbon is an advantage with cover crop and reduced tillage. Cover crops vary in production expense.

Cover crops, in conjunction with reduced-till planting and rotation, could be an important part of row crop farmers’ moisture management systems — and in some cases could provide a bump in yield.

“Cover crops are not a new concept,” says Paul DeLaune, associate professor and environmental soil scientist at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at Vernon, Texas, who discussed the benefits of these practices at the Red River Crops Conference at Altus, Okla. The conference, in its third year, alternates between Texas and Oklahoma, and is a joint venture of Oklahoma State University and Texas AgriLife Extension.

The geography targeted by conference organizers includes the Texas Rolling Plains and Southwest Oklahoma, areas that share similar climates, soils, and farm enterprise options. Limited moisture is a common problem for Red River producers.

Taking a new look at a concept that has been a common practice in agriculture in the past, but not as much in recent years, may help stretch limited water supplies, DeLaune says.

“Cover crops slow erosion, improve soil, smother weeds, and enhance nutrient and moisture availability,” he says. Putting more acreage in cover crops has become a significant target for conservation advocates.


DeLaune says an expressed goal in the 2014 National Cover Crop conference was to increase cover crop acreage from the current 2 million acres to 20 million by 2020. USDA-NRCS initiatives include an effort to “armor the soil, increase diversity, and have a living root year-round.” Another initiative is to increase global water capture by 20 percent by 2030.

“A ‘4 per mil’ international initiative also seeks to increase soil organic carbon by 0.4 percent annually and to halt the annual increase of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.”

To determine how to proceed, DeLaune says, managers first must determine current soil health. Soil sampling,  testing for nitrogen, ammonia and carbon; soil moisture analysis; recording crop yields; taking forage samples; and determining annual biomass production are initial steps to determine soil health and the needed practices to improve it.

For the latest on southwest agriculture, please check out Southwest Farm Press Daily and receive the latest news right to your inbox.

He has conducted research on several cropping systems over several years, including conventional tillage, no-till, no-till with cover crops, and with various cover crop mixes. Cover crop options include Austrian winter field pea, wheat, crimson clover, Sunn hemp, and hairy vetch. Cover crops were terminated at various times, depending on species, before planting cotton in May.

NRCS offers a recommended cover crop mixture to provide adequate cover and residue for no-till planting. In some cases, funding for cover crop establishment may be available from NRCS.


A significant advantage with a cover crop is the ability to capture and store moisture during the off-season for use by summer crops. DeLaune says tests often don’t show a statistically significant yield increase, but cover crops and reduced tillage provide other benefits, including reduced erosion and improved soil health.

Moisture infiltration increases with both no-till and cover crop production. He says cover crops will reduce stored moisture during peak growth periods, but following rainfall or irrigation soil recharge is improved over conventional tillage without cover crops.

A last soil prep tillage will dry out the soil, he says. “Even if we get rain, we don’t get the recharge we get from no-till, with or without a cover. With conventional tillage, we store 10 percent to 20 percent less soil moisture.”

He also notes that a cover crop’s ability to capture water makes recovery of residual nitrogen more likely, especially with a mixed species cover. “A mixed species cover helps bring nitrogen from the subsurface to the soil surface,” DeLaune says. “In some fields, that may be the only way we can mine and recoup that residual nitrogen.”

Last year offered a different perspective for comparison. Winter and spring rainfall resulted in less loss of stored moisture. “This was the first year we saw a significant beneficial response with the cover crop,” he says. “We saw significant yield advantage with wheat versus no cover crop.”


Carbon capture is also a significant goal with cover cropping systems, DeLaune says, noting that a 30-year continuous cotton study shows 90 percent carbon loss. “Switching back to no-till rebuilds carbon by only an insignificant amount over 25 years — the carbon is lost. Continuous cotton provides little residue, and when we get a 20-inch rain in May, a lot of soil washes away. Infiltration rate is greatly improved with no-till and a cover crop. Over time, no-till improves soil infiltration.”

Cover crop establishment and management cost will be a factor, he says, and may be more than can be recouped with increased yield. Cost of growing a cover crop ranges from less than $10 per acre to as much as $30 per care, depending on the species.

But DeLaune says, improved soil health offers a long-term value. “We reduce soil erosion, decrease ruts, and limit compaction. Studies also show significantly less runoff with no-till and a cover crop.”

Rotation with a high residue crop, such as grain sorghum, improves oil health and cotton yield potential, he says. “In studies comparing continuous cotton with a sorghum/cotton rotation, organic matter is higher in the fields with the high residue from sorghum. With continuous cotton, we see no significant carbon buildup.”


Rotation with a good residue crop may be as good as using a cover crop, based on recent studies. “We see significant benefits with rotation,” he says, “and we highly encourage it.”

DeLaune says managing moisture and improving soil health has become an increasingly important issue over the past few drought-plagued years, making more attractive systems that allow producers to make more efficient use of water.

“We have observed higher infiltration rates and reduced runoff rates with no-till or conservation till cropping systems versus conventional tillage.  Practices such as no-till can increase surface moisture retention, potentially expanding planting windows.”

Producers should be aware that cover crops may take up stored soil moisture early, DeLaune says, but recharge following rain or irrigation will be much improved. “You can expect to see soil moisture benefits during the transition from conventional to conservation tillage systems.”

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.