Sponsored By
Farm Progress

Pale yellow wheat could indicate sulfur deficiencyPale yellow wheat could indicate sulfur deficiency

Sulfur deficiency may mimic nitrogen deficiency.Whole plant will be pale.Including sulfur in a fertilizer program is more efficient and less costly.

May 3, 2011

2 Min Read

Wheat that has developed a pale yellow color this spring may have sulfur deficiency, said Dorivar Ruiz Diaz, K-State Research and Extension nutrient management specialist. Fields with sulfur deficiency have been found recently in south central and north central Kansas, he said.

Sulfur deficiency symptoms in wheat can be similar to nitrogen deficiency, with a general chlorosis of the leaf, but there are differences.

“With sulfur deficiency, the whole plant is pale, with a greater degree of chlorosis in the young leaves. Sulfur is not mobile in the plant like nitrogen, so lower leaves do not show more severe deficiency symptoms than the upper leaves. That is just the opposite of the pattern with nitrogen deficiency,” Ruiz Diaz said.

The uniform nature of the yellowing on the plants is one means of diagnosing sulfur deficiency in wheat, he added.

“Sulfur deficiency often occurs first on slopes, eroded areas, on coarser soils or wherever organic matter levels are lowest. Therefore, deficiencies are usually limited to only certain areas of the field,” the K-State agronomist explained.

Sulfur deficiencies are more likely to occur when soils are cold in the spring. But sulfur deficiencies also can be evident during the remainder of the growing season, particularly in soils prone to sulfur deficiency, Ruiz Diaz said. During the period of residue buildup in no-tillage, sulfur mineralization may also be limited, he added.

Including sulfur in a fertilizer program to avoid sulfur deficiency is more efficient and less costly than correcting a sulfur deficiency once it occurs, he said.

“Typically, a soil application of 15 to 40 pounds of sulfate-sulfur per acre is sufficient to prevent sulfur deficiency. Adding ammonium thiosulfate to liquid nitrogen solutions or blending ammonium sulfate with urea are convenient and cost-effective ways to provide sulfur,” Ruiz Diaz explained.

Other sources include elemental sulfur; however, this source is not available to the crop immediately and should be applied in time to allow conversion to the sulfate form of sulfur, he said. Gypsum, which is calcium sulfate, also can be an economical and effective fertilizer option.

For more information on sulfur, see K-State Research and Extension publication MF-2264, “Sulfur in Kansas: Plant, Soil and Fertilizer Considerations” at your local county extension office, or: http://www.ksre.ksu.edu/library/CRPSL2/mf2264.pdf.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like