Farm Progress

5 wrong reasons for not filling out NASS survey

The truth is you may be jeopardizing your own interests by passing on filling out USDA surveys.

Tom Bechman 1, Editor, Indiana Prairie Farm

November 17, 2016

3 Min Read

The National Corn Growers Association launched a major effort to educate members as to why it’s important to fill out government surveys. Consequently, the Indiana Corn Marketing Council and Indiana Soybean Alliance also initiated campaigns. These groups deserve credit for making an effort to inform farmers about the validity of these surveys.

Like it or not, government agencies tend to make better decisions when their information is adequate and accurate. Those decisions impact a number of things, from crop insurance to farm programs.

Here are five excuses farmers sometimes give for not returning surveys. Each one is debunked with information largely provided by ICMC and ISA.

5_wrong_reasons_filling_nass_survey_1_636148313074175247.jpg

1. “I don’t trust the government with my information about yields and crops.”

The truth is that the National Agricultural Statistics Service is bound by strict regulations to protect the identity and privacy of people supplying information for surveys. The information remains confidential and is used to make estimates. It may also factor into decision-making on current and future farm programs.

2. “No one is going to ever use the information anyway!”

Where do you think information like county yields, reported in late winter of the year following the cropping season, comes from? It comes from information provided on NASS surveys. ICMC reports that in 2015, five Indiana counties couldn’t publish corn yields because of insufficient responses. Under NASS rules, yields for two adjoining counties were also withheld.

These seven counties could be just the tip of the iceberg. If counties that have been receiving the minimum number of responses allowed receive less in the future, yields for those counties won’t be published either.

3. “We’re better off if the government doesn’t know what we’re doing out here.”

There is no data to support that shortsighted comment. In the absence of accurate information, people make estimates and assumptions. These seldom result in programs that are better than ones that might have been enacted if accurate information was available.

4. “If I throw my survey away, it won’t matter. Enough other people will return them.”

What if everyone thinks that way? Very few NASS surveys would get returned. As noted, that’s already happening in some counties.

Here’s the kicker. NASS selects farmers to receive surveys at random according to a very sophisticated process designed to deliver statistically valid results. If someone doesn’t return a survey, NASS doesn’t send an additional one to someone else. Instead, there is simply one less data point for that county.

5. “It takes too much time. Besides, I don’t pay much attention to snail mail anymore.”

The surveys typically aren’t difficult to fill out. Questions have been refined over time. And if you are into computers more than snail mail, you can return your response electronically. You simply use the individual code on your survey label to file your response. In fact, if you visit ncga.com/nass, you’ll find a link at the bottom of the home page that allows you to complete and submit the NASS survey you received in the mail online.

About the Author

Tom Bechman 1

Editor, Indiana Prairie Farm

Tom Bechman is an important cog in the Farm Progress machinery. In addition to serving as editor of Indiana Prairie Farmer, Tom is nationally known for his coverage of Midwest agronomy, conservation, no-till farming, farm management, farm safety, high-tech farming and personal property tax relief. His byline appears monthly in many of the 18 state and regional farm magazines published by Farm Progress.

"I consider it my responsibility and opportunity as a farm magazine editor to supply useful information that will help today's farm families survive and thrive," the veteran editor says.

Tom graduated from Whiteland (Ind.) High School, earned his B.S. in animal science and agricultural education from Purdue University in 1975 and an M.S. in dairy nutrition two years later. He first joined the magazine as a field editor in 1981 after four years as a vocational agriculture teacher.

Tom enjoys interacting with farm families, university specialists and industry leaders, gathering and sifting through loads of information available in agriculture today. "Whenever I find a new idea or a new thought that could either improve someone's life or their income, I consider it a personal challenge to discover how to present it in the most useful form, " he says.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like