Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: IA

Time cover crop termination for better weed control

Photos by Prashant Jha Soybean planting in a living cereal rye cover crop
PLANTING GREEN: Soybeans are planted into a living cereal rye cover crop at the Iowa State University Research Farm in Boone in 2020.
Letting cover crops accumulate more biomass can help with weed suppression.

Current cooler weather conditions are posing challenges for growers to get cereal rye cover crops terminated. However, for growers planning to plant soybeans into the rye cover crop, there may be a perk to letting the rye cover crop accumulate more biomass — the perk being that cover crop biomass can help with weed suppression. The ability of cereal rye to suppress weeds is directly related to the biomass accumulation at the time of termination.

Iowa State University conducted field experiments at Ames and Boone in 2019-20. A cereal rye cover crop (Elbon variety) was drill-seeded at 60 pounds per acre in the second week of October 2019 and terminated with Roundup (glyphosate 1.12 pounds acid equivalent per acre) at different timings in spring 2020 (Table 1). No cover crop plots were kept fallow until soybean planting.

In the field trial conducted in Ames, comparisons were made between different cereal rye termination timings on weed suppression. The cover crop terminated 14 days after soybean planting accumulated greater biomass and provided higher levels of marestail (horseweed) and waterhemp suppression compared to termination dates of seven days before soybean planting or at soybean planting.

Cereal rye cover crop termination timing and biomass accumulation table

In the field trial conducted in Boone, comparisons were made between a cereal rye cover crop that was terminated at the time of soybean planting versus a no cover crop treatment. Cereal rye accumulated 4,658 pounds per acre biomass and provided greater than 30% reduction in waterhemp emergence during the growing season compared to no cover crop plots.

In addition to reductions in waterhemp, the cover crop residue reduced the size and biomass of the waterhemp plants at the time of a post-herbicide application. The cover crop resulted in greater than 65% reduction in waterhemp seed production compared with no cover crop plots.

Effect of cereal rye cover crop terminated at soybean planting on waterhemp emergence and growth in soybean

The effect of cereal rye cover crop terminated at soybean planting on waterhemp emergence and growth in soybeans is studied at the ISU Research Farm in Boone in 2020.

In this study, soybean emergence, growth, canopy development and grain yields were not affected when the cereal rye cover crop was terminated at soybean planting compared to no cover crop plots.

Biomass and residual herbicides

Based on the results from the 2020 field studies, terminating the cereal rye cover crop at or after soybean planting didn’t eliminate the need for a preemergence soil residual herbicide. A residual herbicide (Prefix 32 ounces per acre) applied at the time of cereal rye termination, with glyphosate as a burndown program, provided better waterhemp control six weeks after soybean planting, compared to a glyphosate-only burndown program, or when Prefix 32 ounces per acre was applied at post timing.

A residual herbicide with multiple sites of action applied as pre along with a high-biomass cover crop termination would reduce selection pressure on post herbicides, a best management practice to manage herbicide resistance.

Although not observed in the 2020 field trials, a high biomass cover crop (delayed termination) may cause physical tie-up of the soil residual herbicide for a longer period, thereby reducing the availability in the soil where preemergence herbicides are active.

Applying the preemergence herbicide early post rather than with the burndown treatment may be an alternative option, especially for waterhemp control later into the season. However, this strategy limits preemergence products that can be applied following soybean emergence.

Ongoing research and on-farm trials conducted over multiple locations in Iowa will help in better understanding the cover crop termination timing by herbicide interactions and the effect of climate variables across years.

In conclusion, cover crops cannot reliably replace other forms of weed control, but this integrated weed management strategy would reduce herbicide selection pressure while improving weed control with herbicides when herbicide-resistant weeds are a problem.

Jha is an associate professor in agronomy and Extension weed specialist at ISU.

Source: ISU ICM News, which is responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and its subsidiaries aren't responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.


Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.