Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: West
DWR logo

DWR posts cost-benefit analysis for WaterFix

Benefits include improved water quality, more reliable water supplies, enhanced disaster preparedness, and climate change resilience, agency says.

The Department of Water Resources (DWR) has released a Benefit-Cost Analysis for California WaterFix by Dr. David Sunding, a professor of natural resource economics at UC Berkeley, that finds WaterFix could bring billions of dollars in benefits to Californians who obtain their water from participating State Water Project (SWP) contractors. These benefits include improved water quality, more reliable water supplies, enhanced disaster preparedness, and climate change resilience.

“The analysis described in this report demonstrates that investment in the California WaterFix results in positive net benefits for the SWP urban and agricultural contractors,” Sunding wrote in the report prepared for DWR.

The economic analysis summarized in the report goes beyond what is legally required for WaterFix and is consistent with methods described in the department’s “Economic Analysis Guidebook.”

The analysis concludes that the WaterFix benefits to SWP water agencies are substantial. SWP urban agencies could see about $3.1 billion in net benefits. SWP agricultural agencies could see about $400 million in net benefits.

“Without WaterFix, State Water Project contractors will see the continued deterioration of their water supply reliability,” Sunding said. “This analysis shows there is substantial benefit for both urban and agricultural water users throughout the state, and that the project will be more affordable for consumers than local alternatives such as desalination and recycling."  He added that the analysis also indicates that “CVP south of Delta contractors would realize positive net benefits were they to utilize and pay for access to the new north Delta conveyance facilities.”

The report compared the benefits and costs of WaterFix in relation to what would likely occur if WaterFix were not built, including further restrictions on existing SWP and CVP operations designed to minimize harmful reverse flows and protect species.

A notable feature of the report is that it monetizes the cost of climate change impacts and the benefits of offsetting those impacts.  “WaterFix helps mitigate the impacts of climate change on the state’s water supply system,” Sunding said.  “This feature of the WaterFix alone is worth several billion dollars and is an important rationale for implementing the project.”

Source: California Department of Water Resources

TAGS: Regulatory
Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish