Farm Futures logo

As options expand, here’s a strategy to cut through the clutter and find out what works best for you.

Ben Potter, Senior editor

December 19, 2019

2 Min Read
121919AgTechBenPotter800.jpg
Connor Lankford, precision ag manager with Idaho-based Valley Agronomics (right), navigates agtech data with two of his customers as they try to gain new insights about their operation.Valley Agronomics

There’s no question that technology has burst into the agriculture industry at a breakneck pace over the past half-decade. From 2013 to 2018, investment to upstream agtech startups (enterprises closer to the farmer, rather than restaurants or groceries) went from $1.5 billion to $6.9 billion, according to AgFunder.

That’s 360% growth in five short years. Last year alone, more than 800 separate deals were made, pumping money into enterprises that are developing products for farm management software, robotics, biotech, bioenergy and much more. The diversity is amazing, but all agtech has a common denominator – the desire for access to a small part of the farmer’s pocketbook.

Here’s the challenge: No farmer has the time, energy or wealth to try more than a handful of new agtech on his or her operation each year, let alone anything approaching 800. So what does smart prioritization look like in an age of unprecedented choice?

Connor Lankford, precision ag manager with Idaho-based Valley Agronomics, is well aware of the situation. Lankford says Valley tries to mirror the approach of forward-thinking farmers through a healthy dose of experimentation.

“We like to pick up new technology and experiment on a small scale with just a few growers and expand what works,” he says. “Our goal is to lower some of the barriers to entry and make it easier to try new things.”

Valley includes an optional package of agtech products for its customers to try each year. Last year’s grab bag included a chlorophyll index and center pivot monitoring tool from Ceres Imaging, plus variable rate functionality, soil surveys and more. Technologies that prove their worth (such as some prior products from Ceres) get moved into the company’s core product lineup.

Valley’s strategy is one that could be easily duplicated by individual farmers. Yet the basic conundrum remains – what’s the best way to cut through the clutter?

Lankford says farmers can answer that questions by asking three other questions about any new agtech they are thinking about adopting on their operation:

  1. Does it bring a return on investment?

  2. How does it work? (i.e., does it increase yields or reduce costs?)

  3. Does it make your life easier?

Oftentimes, that third question gets lost in the shuffle, Lankford says. But every operation, no matter how big or small, is afforded the same 24 hours to get the job done every day.

“What’s your time worth?” he ponders. “It may be work exploring whether a technology simply reduces a load and frees you up to do other things.”

There’s little doubt that agtech options will continue to grow. Grand View Research predicts that precision farming will see an annual growth rate of more than 14% through 2025. As new technology enters the fray, don’t be afraid to keep asking questions

About the Author(s)

Ben Potter

Senior editor, Farm Futures

Senior Editor Ben Potter brings two decades of professional agricultural communications and journalism experience to Farm Futures. He began working in the industry in the highly specific world of southern row crop production. Since that time, he has expanded his knowledge to cover a broad range of topics relevant to agriculture, including agronomy, machinery, technology, business, marketing, politics and weather. He has won several writing awards from the American Agricultural Editors Association, most recently on two features about drones and farmers who operate distilleries as a side business. Ben is a graduate of the University of Missouri School of Journalism.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like