is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal of Case Against Monsanto

Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal of Case Against Monsanto

Case alleged that Monsanto's GMO varieties threaten organically raised crops

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it would not hear an appeal by the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association requesting that Monsanto agree to not sue GMO trait patent violators if plants containing the traits were inadvertently grown.

The case was filed in a Manhattan Federal District Court by OSGTA and a collection of others in 2011.

"U.S. family farmers should not have to endure legal intimidation by giant corporate agribusinesses, like Monsanto, when genetic pollution from their products contaminates crops," said Mark A. Kastel, Senior Farm Policy Analyst for the Wisconsin-based Cornucopia Institute, one of the plaintiffs.

NO-GO: Supreme Court will not hear arguments in organic group's legal case against Monsanto

The groups said inadvertent pollination of non-GMO crops by GMO varieties was a serious concern, and Monsanto should agree to not sue if it happens.

But the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit told the group in June that it could not challenge Monsanto because the company had already made "binding assurances" that it will not take legal action against growers whose crops contain trace amounts of the company's patented genes.

According to its Farmers & Patents commitment document, Monsanto has already committed to avoiding lawsuits when unintended contamination is believed to be at fault.

"We do not exercise our patent rights where trace amounts of our patented seeds or traits are present in a farmer's fields as a result of inadvertent means," the document says.

Related commentary: Organic Appeal Against Monsanto: A Menacing Bear or Trojan Horse?

The appeals court judges affirmed a previous decision from the Southern District of New York that the plaintiffs in the case did not present a sufficient controversy to warrant judgment by the courts.

While the court did not side with OSGTA as a whole, the group feels they received a partial victory, because three justices agreed with the assertion that contamination by Monsanto was "inevitable."

The justices determined that trace amounts of patented material would be defined as 1%, and if plants are found to contain less than 1% of patented material, Monsanto may not sue.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.