is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
Researchers Test Organic, Inorganic Swine Supplements for Efficiency

Researchers Test Organic, Inorganic Swine Supplements for Efficiency

University of Illinois researchers test three types of supplements for efficiency in swine diets

Research from the University of Illinois may help swine producers decide which micromineral supplements – organic or inorganic – are best for their pigs, thereby reducing waste and improving the animal's use of the supplement.

Organic microminerals may be produced by chelating mineral ions with organic molecules such as hydroxy methylthio butanoic acid or glycine. Inorganic microminerals are metal salts such as sulfates or oxides.

"Our theory was that organic sources of microminerals are better digested by the pigs and result in less waste and more economical feeding," said Hans H. Stein, a professor of animal sciences at the U of I.

University of Illinois researchers test three types of supplements for efficiency in swine diets

Stein's lab conducted an experiment to compare digestibility in organic sources of microminerals and inorganic sources fed to weanling pigs. They fed 48 growing pigs diets based on either corn and soybean meal, or a low mineral diet based on corn grits and sorghum.

To the diets, researchers then added one of three supplements: a supplement containing inorganic sources zinc, copper, manganese, and iron in the form of sulfates; a supplement containing organic sources of the same minerals chelated with HMTBa or glycine; or a basal supplement that did not contain any of these four microminerals.

Results indicated that responses to organic versus inorganic microminerals depended on the type of diet. When pigs were fed the corn-soybean meal diet supplemented with organic minerals, they had increased absorption, retention, and apparent total tract digestibility of zinc, copper, and manganese, as well as increased absorption and retention of iron compared with pigs fed the inorganic sources of minerals.

There was no difference in absorption, retention, or ATTD of microminerals for pigs fed corn grits and sorghum diets supplemented with organic or inorganic sources of minerals.

"Corn-soybean meal diets contain more phytic acid than corn grits diets," Stein explained. "Minerals can form complexes with phytic acid that are indigestible by the pigs, but these results indicate that organic microminerals are less likely to form complexes. So, in a high-phytate diet, organic microminerals can improve ATTD and absorption of minerals."

Stein's paper discussing the study was recently published in the Journal of Animal Science. It was co-authored by Yanhong Liu of the University of Illinois along with Yulin Ma, Junmei Zhao, and Mercedes Vazquez-Añón of Novus International of St. Charles, Missouri.

Novus International provided financial support for the research.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.