Farm Progress

Reviewing yield maps and determining what worked and didn't work are key winter tasks.

Tom Bechman 1, Editor, Indiana Prairie Farm

November 1, 2016

3 Min Read

Even if harvest is wrapped up, the work isn’t done for 2016. Many farmers say now is a great time to plan ahead for next year. A big part of that planning is looking at yield maps to see what worked and what didn’t work in 2016.

This information comes from the Indiana Conservation Partnership. Members of the Natural Resources Conservation Service team contributing to this effort include Don Donovan and Clint Harrison. Both are NRCS district conservationists.

Yield map analysis

The talk at the coffee shop this time of year is typically about how well the crops yielded. What better way to prove you raised a record crop than a pretty yield map you can show off to everyone?

ready_spring_1_636135969237507944.jpg

Harrison thinks that yield map can give you so much more than bragging rights. A yield map can help you figure out problem areas in your field so you can plan for an even better crop next year. 

For example, by comparing your yield map to a soils map, you may determine that some fluctuations in yield come from different types of soil on your farm. You may need to manage them differently. If you soil test, you may see where you need to amend your soil for next year. You may also see where you should start to increase your organic matter. 

Other factors to evaluate along with your yield maps include these five things: 

1. Crop hybrids. Be sure to account for different hybrids or varieties when looking at yield map results.

2. Topographical maps. These maps show low and high areas. If you have this information available, it can also show areas in the field that might be more susceptible to soil erosion.

3. Old land uses. To better understand yield maps, it helps to know the history of the field. Maybe there were old field boundaries or wood lots in what is now one large field. Knowing these things may help explain why you see yield differences. Read about a good example of this on Randy Overman's Peru farm.

4. Weather differences. If you have weather information available, consider it when you look at yield maps from various fields. If you farm over a large area, you may need weather data from more than one source to understand why your yield maps look like they do.

5. Compaction from high-traffic areas. In areas where yield maps indicate lower yield, one cause to look for is compaction. Typically, end rows tend to have more soil compaction because they see the most traffic in any one season.

Multiyear process

Harrison says it may take a few years for you to decide to make a large management decision based on your findings from yield maps. He encourages you to take a look at where the most loss occurred, and what would be the most economical things to change. 

Comparing yield maps with these five factors in mind may help make that picture clearer. Improving precision application of fertilizer, chemicals and seed may help. Reducing soil runoff that is taking away your soil and nutrients is another option. Compacted areas may benefit from cover crops.

You may decide that perhaps a certain hybrid or variety is not suited to the soils and weather patterns that your farm sees in a typical year.

About the Author(s)

Tom Bechman 1

Editor, Indiana Prairie Farm

Tom Bechman is an important cog in the Farm Progress machinery. In addition to serving as editor of Indiana Prairie Farmer, Tom is nationally known for his coverage of Midwest agronomy, conservation, no-till farming, farm management, farm safety, high-tech farming and personal property tax relief. His byline appears monthly in many of the 18 state and regional farm magazines published by Farm Progress.

"I consider it my responsibility and opportunity as a farm magazine editor to supply useful information that will help today's farm families survive and thrive," the veteran editor says.

Tom graduated from Whiteland (Ind.) High School, earned his B.S. in animal science and agricultural education from Purdue University in 1975 and an M.S. in dairy nutrition two years later. He first joined the magazine as a field editor in 1981 after four years as a vocational agriculture teacher.

Tom enjoys interacting with farm families, university specialists and industry leaders, gathering and sifting through loads of information available in agriculture today. "Whenever I find a new idea or a new thought that could either improve someone's life or their income, I consider it a personal challenge to discover how to present it in the most useful form, " he says.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like