is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
Public Comment Extended On Animal ID Rule

Public Comment Extended On Animal ID Rule

USDA has extended the period for public comment on it's proposed new livestock identification rule for mandatory livestock traceability. New deadline is Friday Dec. 9, 2011.

USDA on October 7, 2011 announced it is extending the deadline for public comments on its proposed rule for mandatory animal traceability, following a request by some livestock organizations for a deadline extension. The organizations had sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack requesting an extension to allow sufficient time for the people who will be affected to analyze the rule and submit comments.

"We have significant concerns about the substance of the rule, and we appreciate USDA providing more time for public comment," says Judith McGeary, executive director of the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance and vice-chair of the USDA Secretary's Advisory Committee on Animal Health. "Livestock farmers need additional time to provide comment about the impact this proposed rule will have."

While USDA already has traceability requirements as part of existing animal disease control programs, the proposed rule goes much further to require animal tracking even absent of clear and documented disease threats, she says. The proposed rule has raised significant concerns among family farm and ranch advocates, who accuse the agency of pushing a program to benefit corporate agribusiness interests rather than animal health.

Many livestock producers contend this goes beyond being an animal health program

"USDA keeps saying this is an animal health program, but it has failed to provide valid animal health reasons for it," says Bill Bullard, who heads R-CALF, a cattle producers advocacy group. "The real push for this program comes from the giant meat packing corporations who want international standards to help their export markets." Bullard suggests that meatpacking companies that wish to export meat should enhance the current voluntary programs that compensate farmers and ranchers for the extra paperwork and costs involved with complying.

The USDA draft rule greatly expands what animals must be identified, including young feeder cattle, which are processed at a young age and never enter the breeding herd. "While any animal can become sick, there is no evidence that tracking feeder cattle will do anything to address animal disease issues in this country," says McGeary. "To the contrary, requiring the large numbers of feeder cattle to be tagged and accompanied by paperwork could actually harm our ability to respond to animal diseases by swamping the system with unnecessary stacks of paper."

While expressing appreciation for the extension to the comment period, the groups continue to argue that USDA needs to reconsider the substance of the rule as well. "For the sake of all Americans, USDA should put the interests of family farmers ahead of the meatpacking lobby," says Mark Kastel, farm policy analyst at The Cornucopia Institute. He suggests livestock farmers take action and submit public comments to USDA as soon as possible.

New deadline for comments on livestock traceability rule is Dec. 9, 2011

Talking points and a sample letter prepared by the Cornucopia Institute can be found on the cornucopia site You can submit comments to USDA either online or by mail.

* ONLINE:!submitComment;D=APHIS-2009-0091-0001

* BY MAIL: Docket No.APHIS–2009–0091

Regulatory Analysis and Development

PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8

4700 River Road Unit 118

Riverdale, MD 20737–1238

"Please also send a copy of your comments to your Congressman and Senators," says Kastel. If you don't know who represents you, you can find out at and

You can read the USDA's proposed new rule at:

You can read the USDA's regulatory analysis, which includes its analysis of the costs of the program and the alleged benefits to the export market, at:
Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.