Farm Futures logo

Proposal clarifies how organic producers and handlers must treat livestock throughout their life including transport and slaughter.

Jacqui Fatka, Policy editor

May 6, 2016

4 Min Read

Consumers look for and trust the organic seal because they know that the U.S. Department of Agriculture stands behind the standards that it represents. In order to ensure consistent application of the USDA organic regulations for organic livestock and poultry operations and maintain confidence in organically labeled products, USDA took action earlier this year by announcing it we will publish and invite public comment on a proposed rule regarding organic livestock and poultry practices.

Related: USDA proposes changes to organic production practices

organic_livestock_standards_proposed_1_635981408288004515.jpg

“It’s an important step that will strengthen consumer confidence in the label and ensure that organic agriculture continues to provide economic opportunities for farmers, ranchers, and businesses around the country,” says Agricultural Marketing Service administrator Elanor Starmer. “This proposal sets clear standards for organic animals, providing clarity to organic operations and certifying agents, and establishing a level playing field for all producers.”  

The proposal aims to clarify how organic producers and handlers must treat livestock and poultry to ensure their health and wellbeing throughout life, including transport and slaughter. It would clarify existing USDA organic regulations and add new requirements for organic livestock and poultry living conditions, transport, and slaughter practices.

For example, the proposed rule establishes minimum indoor and outdoor space requirements for organic poultry and clarifies that outdoor spaces must be soil-based. The proposed indoor stocking densities for layers allow a maximum of 3.0 – 4.5 pounds of hen per square foot of indoor space depending on the housing type. Outdoor space for poultry is a maximum of 2.25 pounds of hen per square foot for layers; 5.0 pounds of hen per square foot for broilers. The outdoor areas will need to have at least 50 percent soil. In addition, porches (screened, roofed areas attached to the poultry house) will not count as outdoor space. Therefore, some operations may need to access additional land in order to comply with this outdoor space requirement.

Related: Roberts calls organic standards 'ridiculous'

New provisions address transport and slaughter practices, such as requiring organic feed during transit. In cases such as poultry slaughter where requirements do not allow feed 24 hours before slaughter, producers and slaughter facilities would need to ensure that transport time did not exceed 12 hours, as the birds would need to be fed at that time. Bedding must be provided on trailer floors and in holding pens as needed to keep livestock clean, dry, and comfortable during transportation and prior to slaughter.

The proposed rule also specifies which physical alterations are allowed and prohibited in organic livestock and poultry production.

AMS expects some increased costs. -- >>>

~~~PAGE_BREAK_HERE~~~

Welfare certification

According to a survey by the Organic Egg Farmers of America, 76% of organic egg production in the U.S. participates in private animal welfare certification programs. Therefore, AMS expects that many of the requirements in the proposed rule are already implemented and will not produce significant costs. Producers may incur some costs such as increased paperwork, building additional fences, providing shade in outdoor areas or creating more doors in poultry houses.

The total retail market for organic products is now valued at more than $39 billion in the United States. AMS says that from 2014 to 2015, the sector grew by 12%.

Related: Number of organic operations grows by 12%

“The demand for organic agriculture continues to grow each year and these proposed changes will build on USDA’s efforts to support organic producers,” says Starmer. “By strengthening standards for organic livestock and poultry, we are ensuring that we meet consumer expectations and maintain the integrity of the organic seal to support the sector’s continued growth.”

In the proposed rule, AMS says it believes that in the context of organic livestock and poultry production, particularly egg production, variations in practices result in consumers receiving inadequate and inconsistent information about livestock products. This is supported by consumer surveys.

“By establishing clear and equitable organic livestock and poultry standards, this rule would help organic producers to more effectively market their products,” the rule explains.

The proposed rule is available to view here. Public participation and comments are vital to USDA's work in organic agriculture. The organic community, stakeholders, and consumers are invited to submit written comments on the proposed rule by visiting www.regulations.gov once the proposed rule has published.  

Related: Money available to make certification more affordable

Comments can also be submitted by mail using the process outlined in the proposed rule, to Paul Lewis, National Organic Program, USDA-AMS-NOP, Room 2646-So., Ag Stop 0268, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20250-0268.

AMS proposes three stages to implementing the rule:

• Within one year of publication of the final rule, all provisions, except for outdoor space requirements for poultry, must be implemented.

• Within three years of publication of the final rule, previously non-certified poultry operations and houses must comply with outdoor space requirements to obtain organic certification.

• Within five years of publication of final rule, all certified organic poultry operations must comply with outdoor space requirements.

About the Author(s)

Jacqui Fatka

Policy editor, Farm Futures

Jacqui Fatka grew up on a diversified livestock and grain farm in southwest Iowa and graduated from Iowa State University with a bachelor’s degree in journalism and mass communications, with a minor in agriculture education, in 2003. She’s been writing for agricultural audiences ever since. In college, she interned with Wallaces Farmer and cultivated her love of ag policy during an internship with the Iowa Pork Producers Association, working in Sen. Chuck Grassley’s Capitol Hill press office. In 2003, she started full time for Farm Progress companies’ state and regional publications as the e-content editor, and became Farm Futures’ policy editor in 2004. A few years later, she began covering grain and biofuels markets for the weekly newspaper Feedstuffs. As the current policy editor for Farm Progress, she covers the ongoing developments in ag policy, trade, regulations and court rulings. Fatka also serves as the interim executive secretary-treasurer for the North American Agricultural Journalists. She lives on a small acreage in central Ohio with her husband and three children.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like