is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
NCBA Files Comments on Waters of the U.S. Proposal

NCBA Files Comments on Waters of the U.S. Proposal

National Cattlemen's Beef Association and Public Lands Council say Waters of the U.S. proposal will expand federal jurisdiction over waters

The National Cattlemen's Beef Association and the Public Lands Council filed comments on the Waters of the U.S. proposal, calling for its immediate withdrawal.

The proposed rule expands the jurisdiction of the U.S. EPA and Army Corps of Engineers and attempts to regulate all land uses, the groups said.

Related: EPA Review Board Stands By Waters of the U.S. Proposal

National Cattlemen's Beef Association and Public Lands Council say Waters of the U.S. proposal will expand federal jurisdiction over waters

"The agencies' proposal jeopardizes private property rights and violates Supreme Court precedent by subjecting nearly all waters to regulation," said NCBA Environmental Counsel Ashley McDonald. "Through the use of broad and ambiguous language, the proposal is a limitless expansion of authority that cannot be supported by the Clean Water Act or the U.S. Constitution."

NCBA and PLC said the agencies must start over with a transparent and inclusive process with more stakeholder involvement.

"The proposed rule places no limit on the federal government's authority over water, violating the Clean Water Act as articulated by the Supreme Court, and will eviscerate over a century of settled water law in much of the country," said Dustin Van Liew, Public Lands Council executive director. "Contrary to the agencies' claims, the exclusions and exemptions in the proposal are unclear and provide the livestock industry no certainty."

McDonald added, "Through this process, cattlemen and women have learned one thing; the only thing that is completely unregulated is the arrogance of the EPA."

Comment on the proposed Waters of the U.S. rule will close Nov. 14. Comments can be submitted via the Federal Register.

Read more about the Waters of the U.S. proposal:
EPA Review Board Stands By Waters of the U.S. Proposal
House Approves Bill Limiting EPA's Waters of the U.S. Proposal
EPA Opens Comments on Waters of the US Language
Senators Request Withdrawal of Waters of the U.S. Interpretive Rule
Waters of the U.S. Support Issued by 8 Attorneys General
AFBF Letter Cites SBA's Review of the Waters of the U.S. Proposal

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish