is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
House Committee Rails Against EPA's 'Secret Science'

House Committee Rails Against EPA's 'Secret Science'

House Committee approves bill to require EPA to make 'public policy by public data.'

The U.S. EPA has been using "secret science," one House Committee continues to suggest, now introducing a bill that will make the agency turn over the data on which it bases its regulations.

The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology approved the bill, the Secret Science Reform Act of 2014, earlier this week, charging that the EPA's regulatory process is "both hidden and flawed."

The bill comes after several years of wrangling with the issue in hearings and correspondence with the agency.

House Committee approves bill to require EPA to make 'public policy by public data.'

The Committee has received letters in support of the bill from more than 80 scientists, it says, along with 30 trade associations, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and the former head of EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee.

Related: Senators' Bill Aims to Block EPA Waters of the US Rule

"[The EPA's regulatory process] hides the data and then handpicks scientists to review it. The American people foot the bill for the EPA's billion dollar regulations and they have the right to see the underlying data," says Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas.

"If the EPA has nothing to hide, and if their data really justifies their regulations, why not make the information public? Data sharing is becoming increasingly common across scientific disciplines," he added.

Related: Getting Paranoid About EPA Would Be Easy For A Farmer

The legislation requires that EPA science be available for validation and replication, "ensuring transparency and accountability," Smith says. It does not require any disclosure of confidential information, the Committee suggests, and provisions in the bill are consistent with the White House's scientific integrity policy.

Ag's concerns
Concerns of EPA not fully releasing data have also surfaced in the ongoing discussion surrounding its revised definition of Waters of the United States, closely watched by ag interests.

In May, the Waters Advocacy Coalition released a review of the EPA's economic analysis of its proposed "waters" rule change, finding that some calculations and basic assumptions used in the analysis were unavailable to the public.

The EPA's analysis, review author and University of California-Berkley faculty member Dr. David Sunding, said, "suffers from a lack of transparency."

Related: Economic Review Backs AFBF Position on Waters Rule

The American Farm Bureau, which supported the WAC review along with several other groups, has been running an awareness campaign regarding the rule change, which it has dubbed a "land grab" that could restrict how farmers manage and care for their land.

A group of Senators last week released a bill to block the EPA's proposed rule; the public can comment on the language on the Federal Register until Oct. 20.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.