is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
'Green Revolutions' Typically Beneficial, but Environmental Impact Uncertain in Africa

'Green Revolutions' Typically Beneficial, but Environmental Impact Uncertain in Africa

Purdue University researchers use economic modeling to study carbon emission effects of agricultural revolution in Africa

Productivity-boosting agricultural innovations in Africa could lead to an increase in global deforestation rates and carbon emissions, a Purdue University study finds, contrary to historical impacts of similar ag technology improvements that have typically lead to lower emissions.

Generally, gaining better yields in one area lessens the need to clear other areas for crops. This avoids extra land conversion that can raise the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere.

Agricultural advances in Africa, however, could have the reverse effect, said Thomas Hertel, a Purdue distinguished professor of agricultural economics.

Agricultural economists Uris Baldos, left, and Thomas Hertel. (Purdue photo)

Related: Changes in Ag Productivity, Climate Change Will Reshape Global Nutrition

"Increasing productivity in Africa – a carbon-rich region with low agricultural yields – could have negative effects on the environment, especially if agricultural markets are highly integrated," he said.

According to Hertel, his study highlights the importance of understanding the interplay between globalization and the environmental impacts of agricultural technology.

"They are deeply intertwined," he says.

Less land or more profit?
Debate surrounds the effects of agricultural innovation on the environment, Hertel noted. Some researchers suggest that more profitable farming will lead to greater GHG emissions and tropical deforestation.

Others say if more crops can be produced using less land, more natural land will be spared.

"We set out to determine who was right," Hertel said. "We discovered that both hypotheses can be valid – it depends on the local circumstances."

Along with researchers Navin Ramankutty and Uris Baldos, Hertel developed economic models to review the impacts of regional improvements in ag technology on land use and carbon emissions globally.


'Green revolution' impacts vary by region
The researchers' analysis showed that historical "green revolutions" in regions such as Latin America and Asia –  in which better varieties of cereal grains produced dramatic gains in harvests – helped spare land and diminish carbon emissions compared with an alternative scenario without crop innovations.

The global effects of a green revolution in Africa, however, are less certain, Hertel said.

"If the future global economy remains as fragmented as it has been historically – a world of very distinct agricultural markets – then a green revolution in Africa will lower global carbon emissions," he said. "But if markets become more integrated, faster agricultural innovation in Africa could raise global carbon emissions in the coming decades."

Related: FAO Releases First Report on Ag GHG Emissions

In an integrated world markets scenario, the researchers' analysis showed that ramping up agricultural productivity in Africa over the years 2025-2050 could increase global cropland expansion by about 4.4 million acres and global carbon emissions by 267 million metric tons.

Why is Africa different?
The sharp differences between the global impacts of a prospective African green revolution and those of previous green revolutions can be traced to several factors, Hertel said.

In an African green revolution, the relatively lower yields of African croplands would require more area to be converted to agriculture to make up for the displaced crop production in the rest of the world. The area converted would likely be carbon intensive and have a low emissions efficiency – that is, crop yields would be low relative to the carbon emissions released by converting the land to crops.

But the potential negative effects of an African green revolution will diminish over time, Hertel said. If sustained over several decades, agricultural innovation in Africa would eventually conserve land and decrease carbon emissions, especially if yields improved quickly.

The most carbon-rich land, however, should be immediately protected from conversion to cropland, he said.

"We need to prevent regions in Africa that are rich in carbon and biodiversity from being cleared for agriculture to avoid increasing emissions," he said. "Boosting yields brings many benefits, but increasing global food supplies while minimizing the environmental footprint of agriculture remains a major challenge."

Hertel's paper detailing the findings was published Sept. 8 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

Source: Purdue

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.