is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
Farm Groups Request More Time to Comment on 'Waters of the U.S.' Proposal

Farm Groups Request More Time to Comment on 'Waters of the U.S.' Proposal

Proposed Waters of the United States definition requires additional time for input, groups suggest

More than 70 agricultural groups Friday told the U.S. EPA that 90 days isn't enough time to prepare and submit comments on the agency's proposed updates to the definition of the waters of the United States.

The signatories – among them the National Pork Producers Council and several other national and state agricultural organizations – are requesting extensions of the comment periods on both the waters rule and its accompanying agricultural exemptions rule.

The two proposals were first announced in March. A 90-day comment period was subsequently initiated in April and is scheduled to conclude July 21.

Related: EPA Opens Comments on Waters of the US Language

Proposed Waters of the United States definition requires additional time for input, groups suggest

The "waters" rule would dictate what falls under the definition of waters of the U.S., therefore designating EPA's and Corps' jurisdiction areas for enforcement of regulations outlined in the Clean Water Act.

Currently, that jurisdiction includes "navigable" waters and waterways with a hydrologic connection to navigable waters. The groups say this could include intermittent and ephemeral streams and ditches.

If the rule were to be approved as written, application of manure on lands near such streams, for example, could be considered a discharge and require a CWA permit, they say.

Related: A Closer Look at EPA Water Rule Proposal

In requesting the extensions, the agricultural groups pointed out that an EPA study of the connection between intermittent waters and wetlands and larger bodies of water has yet to be completed. They also said the timing of the comment period and stakeholder public meetings coincide with one of the busiest times for farmers, many of whom are in the middle of planting or harvest.

"For most farmers and ranchers," said NPPC President Howard Hill, "more than two-thirds of the comment period for the proposed rule occurs when we are in the fields round the clock, not sitting at our computers reading regulatory proposals."

Related: Economic Review Backs AFBF Position on Waters Rule

The agricultural groups also raised in their request concerns that EPA has made during stakeholder meetings statements on the rules that it then has contradicted in public pronouncements, complicating the groups' ability to develop meaningful comments.

The organizations are asking for an additional 90 days beyond July 21, or 90 days after EPA releases its "Connectivity Report," which is supposed to serve as the scientific basis for any expansion of CWA jurisdiction.

For the agricultural exemptions rule, the groups are requesting that the comment deadline coincide with the closing date for the proposed rule but be at least an additional 45 days beyond the current June 5, 2014, deadline.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.