is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: MN
Farm Groups Fight Forestry Water Regulations

Farm Groups Fight Forestry Water Regulations

AFBF, NPPC and NFU join fight against EPA regulation of stormwater runoff from forestry activities.

A group of farm organizations on Thursday filed a friend-of-the court brief with the Supreme Court regarding the Clean Water Act's permitting requirements for stormwater runoff from forestry activities.

The groups, including the American Farm Bureau Federation, the National Pork Producers Council and the National Council of Farmer Cooperatives, urged the Supreme Court to reaffirm Congress' intent to exclude stormwater runoff from forestry activities requiring CWA permits.

AFBF, NPPC and NFU join fight against EPA regulation of stormwater runoff from forestry activities.

In 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit invalidated the Environmental Protection Agency's Silviculture Rule, relied on by forest landowners for 35 years. In urging the Supreme Court to reverse the decision, the farm groups explained that Congress confirmed in its 1987 Clean Water Act amendments that stormwater from both agriculture and forestry – whether harvesting crops, raising livestock or harvesting trees – has always been intentionally excluded from federal permit requirements.

"Congress has never allowed EPA to be in the business of mandating particular forestry practices, any more than it allows EPA to regulate how crops are grown," said Ellen Steen, AFBF's general counsel.

"Congress has always recognized that stormwater runoff from these activities, whether it flows through a ditch or not, is best left to state and local authorities. And states have been very successful in designing their own programs to protect water quality," Steen explained.

The lower court's ruling invalidated EPA's 1976 Silviculture Rule, concluding that logging roads and associated stormwater collection systems must be viewed as "point sources" of pollution regulated under a national program – EPA's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit program.

The farm groups argued that the lower court ruled incorrectly that logging is "industrial activity," concluding that stormwater discharges from those activities must be authorized under an NPDES stormwater permit as part of EPA's stormwater regulations. The Supreme Court has agreed to review the decision.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.