is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
COOL Advocates Ask to Intervene in Labeling Lawsuit

COOL Advocates Ask to Intervene in Labeling Lawsuit

Groups say consumers want COOL labels; prepare to intervene in COOL lawsuit

The National Farmers Union Friday announced that it intends to intervene in the lawsuit filed July 10 against the USDA seeking to nullify the USDA's May 23 final rule regarding Country of Origin Labeling.

If granted an intervention, NFU, along with partnering organizations – U.S. Cattlemen's Association, Consumer Federation of America and American Sheep Industry Association – intend to defend the COOL regulation, which requires muscle cuts to be labeled based on where the animal was born, raised and slaughtered.

Nine groups filed the original lawsuit, arguing that COOL violates World Trade Organization obligations by creating consumer bias against imported goods.

Groups say consumers want COOL labels, prepare to intervene in COOL lawsuit

Specifically, they alleged that the COOL rule: 1) violates the United States Constitution by compelling speech in the form of detailed labeling on meat products that do not directly advance a government interest; 2) exceeds the scope of the statutory mandate, because the statute does not permit the kind of labeling requirements the final rule puts in place; and 3) imposes burdens on the meat industry with little to no benefit.

Parties involved in the original lawsuit include the American Meat Institute, the American Association of Meat Processors, American Meat Institute, Canadian Cattlemen’s Association, Canadian Pork Council, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, National Pork Producers Council, North American Meat Association, and Southwest Meat Association.

The group also filed for a temporary injunction on July 26, arguing that enforcement of the rule would cause irreparable harm to the industry and have severe economic impacts that are not in the public interest.

While the groups are concerned about potential trade disruptions and added processing costs, NFU and its partnering organizations, however, maintain that COOL is a benefit to U.S. farmers and consumers.

They point to a Consumer Federation of America study that found 90% of adult Americans favored requiring food sellers to indicate on the package label the country of origin of fresh meat they sell.

"There is no denying that U.S. consumers want to know where their food comes from," said NFU President Roger Johnson. "That is why it is great to have a united front of consumers and producers in this alliance in support of COOL."

The Court has scheduled a hearing on the preliminary injunction motion for Aug. 27.

For a complete background on the issue, visit the stories below:
COOL Rule Opponents Seek Court Injunction
Meat Interests Take USDA To Court Over COOL Rule
Canada Poised To Retaliate on COOL Ruling
USDA Retains Country of Origin Labeling Requirement
Proposed COOL Changes Met With Mixed Reaction
COOL Ruled Non-Compliant With WTO Agreement

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.