is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
A Closer Look at EPA's Waters of the US Proposal

A Closer Look at EPA's Waters of the US Proposal

In his five-part series, Gary Baise provides a thorough look into what EPA's proposed changes for the 'Waters of the U.S.' definition means for farmers.

Gary Baise, a Farm Futures blogger and lawyer at OFW Law, often finds himself in court fighting the Environmental Protection Agency over water litigation. When he hears EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy say the newly proposed waters of the U.S. rule isn’t an expansion of EPA’s jurisdiction, he has the facts to back her contradictions. He's outlined why the rule would harm agriculture in a five-part series on our site.

"My hope is that people can get the idea that something smells here with EPA saying one thing and the facts screaming something else," Baise says.

In his five-part series, Gary Baise provides a thorough look into what EPA’s water rule means for farmers

Over the spring Baise provided a five-part series at his blog, Defending Agriculture, at The series looks at the specifics of exactly what the new rule would allow EPA to oversee.

Baise outlines in his blog post on EPA’s definition of tributary that the agency takes the position that a 'tributary' may be "…ephemeral, intermittent or perennial, but the tributary must drain, or be part of a network of tributaries that drain," into waters which are currently used, used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate commerce in the future.

EPA says that intermittent and ephemeral streams, when in a watershed and are considered in combination, have a "significant nexus" to traditional navigable waters and interstate waters.

"Not much left that EPA cannot claim jurisdiction over when it comes to water coming off your property," Baise says.

Gary Baise

Read his full series by clicking on his blogs below.
Water Police, Part One: EPA Coming to Your Farm?
Water Police, Part Two: EPA Proposal Won't Help Ag
Water Police, Part Three: EPA's Definition of 'Tributary'
Water Police, Part Four: EPA's Definition of 'Adjacent Waters'
Water Police, Part Five: EPA’s Definition of ‘Other Waters’

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.