indiana Prairie Farmer Logo

Experts say it doesn't destroy the soil as some claim.

Tom Bechman 1, Editor, Indiana Prairie Farm

January 24, 2011

2 Min Read

Anhydrous ammonia is still the cheapest game in town when it comes to N fertilizer for corn per dollar of N. And there are nevertheless still legitimate reasons not to use it, such as safety, or if injecting on hillsides will open up fields for soil erosion during heavy rain events. However, experts contend that not choosing it just because you think it's bad for your soil is not a valid excuse, or reason for making a decision. They insist it's just not true.

If you've been to any farm meeting at all, especially conservation tillage or no-till meetings, you've heard at least once if not multiple times that anhydrous ammonia hurts the soil. In effect, those who make that statement often say it destroys all soil bacteria, and kills off the earthworm population.

Both Jim Camberato, Purdue University Extension soil fertility specialist, and Danny Greene of Greene Consulting, Franklin, say the evidence simply doesn't support any such conclusion. Instead, Greene's conclusion is that under the current economic conditions, anhydrous ammonia should be a strong contender for the system of choice in most situations.

What does happen, both notes, is that anhydrous ammonia typically wipes out fungi and bacteria in a zone about 3 inches in diameter at the tip of the injection point. Compared to the overall mass of soil in the field, it's a tiny amount. As far as earthworms, if the knife slices one in two, yes, it will kill one.

Soil beyond the zone that forms around the injection point at the end of the knife is not affected, Greene says. You also get a zone of bacteria and fungi kill around the point of injection if you inject 28% N under the soil, such as in no-till situation, but that zone is more like an inch in diameter, which means it's considerably smaller.

Here's the kicker, however. From an N loss standpoint, a bigger zone of kill is actually an advantage. Why? Camberato says it's because the anhydrous kills the denitrification bacteria along with everything else. Bacteria and fungi soon repopulate the soil that was affected. If the zone was bigger, it takes them longer to repopulate it. So bacteria would be back at work denitrifiyng 28% injections before they could repopulate and begin causing losses of N on anhydrous injections,

There's one other point, too, he adds. When you apply 28% N, it's already one-fourth in the nitrate form, easily a target for losses. Anhydrous ammonia is not in that form. The conversion must happen first.

About the Author(s)

Tom Bechman 1

Editor, Indiana Prairie Farm

Tom Bechman is an important cog in the Farm Progress machinery. In addition to serving as editor of Indiana Prairie Farmer, Tom is nationally known for his coverage of Midwest agronomy, conservation, no-till farming, farm management, farm safety, high-tech farming and personal property tax relief. His byline appears monthly in many of the 18 state and regional farm magazines published by Farm Progress.

"I consider it my responsibility and opportunity as a farm magazine editor to supply useful information that will help today's farm families survive and thrive," the veteran editor says.

Tom graduated from Whiteland (Ind.) High School, earned his B.S. in animal science and agricultural education from Purdue University in 1975 and an M.S. in dairy nutrition two years later. He first joined the magazine as a field editor in 1981 after four years as a vocational agriculture teacher.

Tom enjoys interacting with farm families, university specialists and industry leaders, gathering and sifting through loads of information available in agriculture today. "Whenever I find a new idea or a new thought that could either improve someone's life or their income, I consider it a personal challenge to discover how to present it in the most useful form, " he says.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like