is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist

Biotech Cotton Making Huge Global Strides As Usage Increases

Report identifies that all countries, especially developing countries, benefit greatly from the increased acceptance and approval of biotech cotton.

Adoption of biotech cotton varieties has been rapid since it was introduced in 1996.

The International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) estimates that biotech cotton varieties were planted on 24% of the world cotton area in 2004/05, accounting for 35% of world production and 31% of cotton traded in the international market. It said nine countries representing 60% of the world area have commercialized biotech cotton varieties.

ICAC panel included members from Australia, France, Greece, Pakistan, the United States and the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications produced a report addressing questions about the benefits and risks of biotech cotton. The Executive Summary is available online for free.

Developing countries can benefit from biotechnology

The Panel found that while insect resistance and herbicide tolerance are the only traits currently available in biotech cottons, a broad range of other traits are under development using modern biotechnology. Principle limitations to the easy and faster spread of biotechnology are identification of suitable genes, intellectual property rights and bio-safety regulations in various countries.

"The products of modern biotechnology are the most rigorously evaluated of any products ever introduced and rigorous assessment of the currently commercialized products (i.e., insect resistant and herbicide resistant cottons) have shown no human health risks or risks to the environment," the report states.

The panel recommended that case-by-case assessment of new products should be undertaken in each geographical region being considered for utilization of a new biotech product. Pre-emptive resistance management strategy as a refuge crop has proved successful, and sustained use of the technology demands that resistance management strategies must be implemented according to local conditions.

A review of published literature from all countries growing biotech cottons indicates significant economic, environmental and social benefits, particularly for resource-poor small farmers in developing countries. Farmer benefits accrue through reductions in pesticide use, equal or higher yields, no impact on fiber quality and increased income, while clear environmental benefits are delivered through reduced pesticide input.

Many countries in Asia, Africa and South America are experimenting with biotech varieties of cotton. The results are encouraging everywhere, but most governments are slow in deciding protocol for importing, experimenting and commercializing release of biotech products.

"The technology has tremendous potential, and countries slow in adoption are depriving their farmers of benefits already availed in numbers of countries," the report says. "All countries should to be free to make their own decisions about adoption of biotech cotton or other products of modern biotechnology, unconstrained by philosophical, ideological, or economic pressures from the outside."

The panel made specific recommendations for the adoption of biotechnology products by developing countries:

  • Develop a centralized regulatory process that is clear, rigorous, expeditious, harmonized and science-based and that requires testing to demonstrate benefits and follow-up procedures to ensure sustainability;
  • Ensure that legislation is in place to protect both the germplasm and the technology;
  • Develop technical teams that can educate farmers and support the use of new technology;
  • Encourage the adoption of the best technology in varieties with demonstrated local performance; and
  • Include biotech cotton as one component of an integrated farming system supporting adoption of IPM (Integrated Pest management) or IWM (Integrated Weed management), not as a replacement or alternative technology.
Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.