is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
Arguments Scheduled in Meat Labeling Lawsuit

Arguments Scheduled in Meat Labeling Lawsuit

Oral arguments in Country of Origin Labeling lawsuit scheduled for Jan. 9.

The United States Cattlemen's Association, as a defendant-intervenor in a lawsuit challenging opposition of the USDA's Country of Origin Labeling rule, said oral arguments in the appeal of the denial of plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction have been scheduled for January 9, 2014.

Oral arguments will be heard by Chief Judge Garland, Circuit Judge Srinivasan and Senior Circuit Judge Williams of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, USCA said.

Jon Wooster, USCA President, said as the lawsuit moves forward, farm bill conferees should avoid repealing the COOL rule.

Oral arguments in Country of Origin Labeling lawsuit scheduled for Jan. 9.

"We believe the legal process should be allowed to play out without any interference from Congress," Wooster explained.

Plaintiffs filed their lawsuit to block COOL on July 8 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.  Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction was denied on Sept. 11.  The nine plaintiffs subsequently filed an appeal of the court's decision denying the preliminary injunction as well as a motion for an expedited hearing.

On Oct. 29, the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied plaintiffs' motion for an expedited hearing.

"Thus far, the plaintiffs in this lawsuit have failed to establish any right to a delay in the implementation of COOL.  Congress should not intervene legislatively at this juncture and should allow the legal process to move forward to its conclusion."

The rules, which go into effect on Nov. 23, require that meat products are clearly labeled with where the originating animal was born, raised and slaughtered. USCA supports the rule because they say it provides customers with additional product information. Opponents say it will cause a rift between the U.S. and trading partners Canada and Mexico.

Read more:
COOL Opponents Plan To Appeal Injunction Decision
Court Denies COOL Opponents' Request for Injunction
Court Grants COOL Supporters' Request to Intervene in Labeling Lawsuit
Canada Issues Formal COOL Challenge
COOL Advocates Ask to Intervene in Labeling Lawsuit
COOL Rule Opponents Seek Court Injunction
Meat Interests Take USDA To Court Over COOL Rule
TAGS: USDA
Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish