Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: IN

All Hybrid (Versions) Not Created Equal

Adding traits can change other factors about hybrids.

If you plant three versions of the same hybrid side-by-side, two versions each containing different traits and the parent version, can you pick them apart? The answer after looking at 60 hybrids in the Farm Progress Corn Illustrated plots seems to be yes. There are obvious similarities, but there can be basic differences too.

Jim Facemire, Edinburgh, cooperator of the plot, helped Dave Nanda, Corn Illustrated consultant and president of Bird Hybrids, Tiffin, Ohio, and Tom J. Bechman, Farm Progress Companies, evaluate one row each of 60 hybrids, planted for observation purposes. Hybrids were rated 1-9 on how they appeared, with factors including everything from ear size to disease package to ability to withstand the tough drought underway in the non-irrigated plots. All these plots were planted on May 1.

A rating of a 1 meant near perfect, with higher numbers meaning less performance. Basically, Facemire was analyzing "Would I want to try this on my acres?" On more than one occasion, they encountered different versions of the same hybrid, planted side-by-side. Often the rating ended up the same, but not always. Facemire and Bechman, who combined to do the actual ratings, didn't know the background of the hybrids, other than maturity in days ratings, when they announced their ratings. Nanda simply recorded the ratings assigned.

There were instances where one version would receive a '3' and another a '4' for example. Once they knew the hybrids were similar, Facemire and Bechman looked for visual differences as well as similarities. In one case, the most obvious difference was leaf width. One hybrid obviously put on wider leaves than the other, even though base genetics were the same, and they shared everything except a certain trait.

Or do they? That's the point, Nanda says- when genes are introduced, it's not a 'cut and splice' in one gene operation. Other genes come along, for better or worse. Sometimes it doesn't matter, but sometimes genes may come along that confer qualities not as good as the original.

"That's why backcrossing several times after inserting genes or making crosses is so important," Nanda stresses. "It's not something easily explained unless you understand genetics. But what it amounts to is that most things happening within a plant, especially related to yield, are not one-gene traits. When you introduce a new trait, several genes go along, not one. It takes backcrossing selection to remove the 'junk' that came along.

Nanda contends that's why new introductions sometimes get off to a rocky start the first year. The other factor, of course, is that a new trait may only be introduced in limited genetics the first year or so. As time goes along, breeders are able to work it into a wider array of products, perhaps some with better yield potential, or products that work well over a broader area of the country.

Take-home message form the hybrid comparison portion of the Corn Illustrated plots is that two hybrids, one with a trait and one not, otherwise supposedly the same, still aren't necessarily identical.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.