Michigan Farmer Logo

On-farm replicated trials conducted in Michigan build a compelling case for reducing soybean planting rates.

April 7, 2022

3 Min Read
branching soybean plant
BRANCHING: This is plant branching when soybeans are planted at 80,000 seeds per acre.Mike Staton, MSU Extension

Michigan soybean producers have consistently identified planting rates as the highest priority topic to evaluate in on-farm replicated trials. Furthermore, the producers wanted to evaluate the effect of low planting rates on soybean yield and income.

The two factors driving the increased interest in reducing soybean planting rates were seed cost and white mold. To help soybean producers make planting rate decisions, the Michigan soybean on-farm research program conducted 67 on-farm replicated trials from 2015 to 2021.

Planting rate trial locations

Because we conducted the trials over seven years, we learned how the planting rates performed over a range of growing conditions. Planting conditions were nearly ideal in 2015, but were much more challenging in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 as evidenced by the average stand loss shown in Table 1.

Average stand loss in planting rate trials

Statewide record yields were achieved in 2015 and again in 2016, and nearly again in 2021. However, lower yields occurred in 2017 because of excessive early rains and a lack of rain in August and September, and in 2019 due to planting delays and dry weather in August.

Table 2 shows the average yield and income for all 67 locations. When all 67 sites were combined, the yields from the highest two planting rates were identical, and they beat the 100,000 seeds-per-acre planting rate by 1 bushel per acre and the 80,000 rate by only 2.7 bushels per acre. The 100,000 and 130,000 planting rates generated the most income, while the 80,000 and 160,000 planting rates produced the least income.

Planting rate effects on average yield and income from 2015 to 2021

The effects of soybean planting rates on yield and income by year are shown in Figure 2. The bars represent yield and the lines represent income. To calculate the income (gross income minus seed cost) generated by each planting rate, we used the USDA projected prices and average seed costs for treated seed for each year. The figure clearly shows the year-to-year variability in yield and income. It also shows the highest planting rate was the least profitable each year.

Planting rate effects on soybean yield and income from 2016 to 2021

Effects on yield and income at two locations infested with white mold

Two of the trials were infested with white mold, showing that reducing soybean planting rates can also be an effective management practice for reducing yield and income losses from white mold (Table 3). At both sites, the lowest planting rate produced $100 per acre more income than the highest planting rate. Figure 3 shows how planting rates affected white mold in the 2018 Saginaw location. This site was planted in 30-inch rows.

Drone image showing planting rate effects on white mold incidence at the 2018 Saginaw trial

Drone image showing planting rate effects on white mold incidence at the 2018 Saginaw trial.

Staton is a Michigan State University Extension soybean educator. This article was produced by a partnership between MSU Extension and the Michigan Soybean Committee and first published by MSUE.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like