January 20, 2023
At a Glance
- Deer densities greater than 20 to 30 deer per square mile may create significant crop loss.
- The deer population in South Carolina is estimated at 750,000.
Deer are unwelcome guests to any soybean field, with figures showing they cause a whopping $30 million annual loss to South Carolina soybean farmers.
The $30 million number comes from USDA’s National Agriculture Statistics Service for 2020, coupled with recent Clemson University research showing an estimated loss of soybeans pegged at 3 million bushels. However, Kendall Kirk, a precision ag engineer at Clemson University, cautioned that the $30 million figure is a crude estimate, due to the limited data currently available on deer damage to crops in South Carolina.
One thing is certain, though, the economic impact due to deer damage to soybeans and other crops in South Carolina is significant. Kirk said there is still more to learn, and more data is needed. Clemson is working with farmers and commodity boards to measure the impact of deer on South Carolina soybeans and other crops.
At the South Carolina Corn and Soybean production meeting, organized by the South Carolina Soybean Board and Clemson Cooperative Extension, at the Santee Civic Center in Santee, S.C., Dec. 14, Kirk highlighted results of the ongoing research looking at deer damage to soybeans in South Carolina.
Kirk credited Clemson Extension Wildlife Biologist Cory Heaton and Ph.D. graduate student Perry Loftis for doing most of the “heavy lifting” and work on the important project. He stressed that deer population estimates conducted by Clemson near agriculture production land demonstrates much higher populations than those reported by the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, which represent regional averages in various areas of the state.
Among the research findings:
Deer densities greater than 20 to 30 deer per square mile may create significant crop loss.
Harvesting 20 to 30% of adult does will stabilize herd density (according to National Deer Association).
The estimated 2020 statewide deer harvest was 198,000 in 2020.
The deer population in South Carolina is estimated at 750,000 (according to the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources 2020 deer report).
Kirk stresses these figures are extrapolations and should be considered crude estimates, given the limited data currently available. Certainly, the question remains, what can farmers do to limit deer damage to soybeans and other crops?
Many farmers use deer repellent, but Kirk noted many studies show just 10 to 14 days efficacy for repellents. After 10 to 14 days, and if there is rain, you will have to reapply repellents.
“When the natural forage runs out, in a dry year, when they don’t have anything to feed on in the woods, where are they going to go? If they are hungry, they are going into your fields. They probably don’t want to come into the fields in the open; they want to stay in the woods if they can, if there is enough for them to eat there, but they will come into your fields when they need to,” Kirk said, noting that it comes down to the risk versus the reward for the deer.
Kirk notes not everyone uses deer repellents, while some farmers use repellents on just some of their land. But he said many farmers are spending $25 or more per acre on deer repellents.
“Nobody wants to hear this, but if you were to put in a high fence, it’s not unreasonable to say you could do it for $250 per acre,” Kirk said. “That’s a tremendous investment. But if that high fence lasted you 10 years, then that’s $25 an acre a year. That’s compared to the same amount you’re spending on repellent that has marginal efficacy and that you are going to have to put out again and again and again.”
Another way to look at the benefit of fences is to examine the damage farmers saw in 2022 with $14-per-bushel beans. Kirk estimated deer damages to soybeans at 13.1 bushels per acre, which comes to an average of $183 per acre.
“If you’re above the average, it’s more than that,” Kirk said. “If you were to invest $250 per acre in a fence, you’d have it paid for it in the first year and you’d make money on it in the second year is what our estimates show right now.”
In an interview with Southeast Farm Press following the Santee meeting, both Kirk and Heaton emphasized the value of fences, but stressed efforts must continue to reduce the overall deer population across South Carolina.
“Once you stand a fence up, immediately you have reduced the carrying capacity,” Kirk explained. “Agriculture is what supports an elevated carrying capacity. It’s what allows you to have more than 20 to 30 deer per square mile.You’re basically laying out a buffet for them every day.Farmers actually can play a role in their own solution.”
Heaton also emphasized fences are still the most effective option for farmers to manage deer. But he said the deer population clearly needs to be reduced across South Carolina.
“In order for other options to work, deer repellents, and other things, we really need to work on reducing that deer herd down to lower densities: 20 to 30 deer per square mile or less,” Heaton said. “In our ag areas, we are more realistically seeing, 125 plus deer per square mile. In fact, in some farming areas across the state, deer densities range from 127 to 272 deer per square mile.
“At our research facility in Blackville, we have worked extensively to keep that herd down and we’re right at 30 deer per square mile,” he said, noting that getting the deer population down to 30 deer per square mile is the ultimate goal for control. If the number can’t be lowered to 30 deer or less per square mile, fencing is basically the only economical option.
Efforts to reduce the populations through hunting, particularly the hunting of does must continue.
“Ideally, your regular deer season would allow the opportunities to do reduce our numbers,” Heaton said. “The Department of Natural Resources in South Carolina has promised me they would work with growers to get them all the doe tags they need to make that happen. The problem is hunters don’t want to do that. Hunters want to go and shoot a doe or two, but they really want to kill bucks. In South Carolina, we harvest more bucks than we do does every single year, and that doesn’t really help us with the overall population.”
Heaton said Clemson is committed to helping farmers find solutions to deer problems.
“The real issue is how much time a farmer has,” Heaton said. “Does he really have time to battle that deer population. It is very time-consuming. If they can’t get it done in the regular hunting season, we do have permits that will allow them to take deer outside of the hunting season, but that requires a lot of nighttime work to get that done. We can’t expect our farmers to work 24 hours a day.
“If we don’t find a solution to this, with the way our deer herd is, you’re going to see more and more fields go out of production each year because of deer problems. And at the rate that our population of humans is growing, those fields are going to be lost forever. They are going into subdivisions, businesses and other uses.”
Read more about:Deer
About the Author(s)
Associate Editor, Southeast Farm Press
John Hart is associate editor of Southeast Farm Press, responsible for coverage in the Carolinas and Virginia. He is based in Raleigh, N.C.
Prior to joining Southeast Farm Press, John was director of news services for the American Farm Bureau Federation in Washington, D.C. He also has experience as an energy journalist. For nine years, John was the owner, editor and publisher of The Rice World, a monthly publication serving the U.S. rice industry. John also worked in public relations for the USA Rice Council in Houston, Texas and the Cotton Board in Memphis, Tenn. He also has experience as a farm and general assignments reporter for the Monroe, La. News-Star.
John is a native of Lake Charles, La. and is a graduate of the LSU School of Journalism in Baton Rouge. At LSU, he served on the staff of The Daily Reveille.
You May Also Like
Has the commodity balloon popped?Feb 03, 2023
Corn spared broad commodity selloffJan 18, 2023
We’re retooling our self-propelled sprayer this winterFeb 03, 2023
Will Brazil dethrone U.S. as largest corn exporter?Feb 03, 2023