June 17, 2021
Watershed-wide nutrient credit trading has been suggested as a mechanism for reducing pollution entering the Chesapeake Bay, but a new study by Penn State researchers suggests that the high cost of producing nitrogen credits through the establishment of riparian buffers on Pennsylvania farmland does not provide an incentive for buffer establishment.
“The nitrogen credit trading market was set up to help reduce pollution from point sources such as sewage treatment plants, and we wanted to see if Pennsylvania farmers could participate by getting credit for establishing riparian buffers,” says Michael Jacobson, professor of forest resources at Penn State. “But it turns out that the cost of establishing and maintaining buffers is too high relative to the current credit price to work in that market.”
But he adds that increases in the market price of nitrogen credits, or bundling nitrogen with other nutrient credits such as phosphorus, could ultimately result in credit trading providing an adequate incentive for riparian buffer establishment.
Vegetated riparian buffers that intercept surface runoff and subsurface leaching of nutrients from agricultural fields are seen as one of the best ways to improve water quality in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, Jacobson says. To comply with federal water quality standards established to clean up the bay, hundreds of miles of new riparian buffers must be built in Pennsylvania.
In a nutrient trading market, sources that reduce their nutrient runoff or discharges below target levels can sell their surplus reductions or “credits” to other sources, allowing those who can reduce nutrients at low cost to sell credits to those facing higher costs, such as wastewater treatment plants and municipal stormwater programs.
Looking at buffer costs
In the study, researchers developed a suite of 36 agricultural riparian buffer scenarios to analyze the effects of buffers on the cost of nitrogen credit production and payback periods.
Scenarios were spread among five Pennsylvania counties — Blair, Centre, Cumberland, Lancaster and Tioga — to represent the range of agricultural practices and estimate nitrogen loading potential to the Chesapeake Bay.
The researchers used the nitrogen credit calculation tool on the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s nutrient credit trading website to estimate the amount of nitrogen credits generated from these riparian buffer scenarios.
To calculate nitrogen credit production costs and payback periods, they obtained cost estimates for establishing riparian forest buffers and riparian herbaceous buffers from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service’s technical field guides for conservation practice establishment.
In findings recently published in Agroforestry Systems, the researchers pegged the true costs of establishing riparian forest buffers at $1,770 per acre. This includes post-establishment management costs such as mowing, herbicide application and reestablishing vegetation because of mortality.
The grass filter strip establishment cost — which includes site preparation, seed costs, labor and capital, and transportation costs — was $1,280 per acre.
The researchers also estimated the revenue lost through conversion of productive farmland to riparian buffers and added that number to buffer establishment costs. The opportunity cost of foregone corn production was calculated based on an estimate of the annual per-acre corn income using inflation-adjusted total production and land ownership costs for mean corn income per acre using USDA Economic Research Service data.
“The cost of establishing riparian buffers far outweighs the potential revenue generated from nitrogen credit trading alone,” Jacobson says. “According to our results, a minimum nitrogen credit price of $9 would be required for nitrogen credit trading revenue to cover only riparian buffer establishment costs over the course of 10 years. This minimum credit price estimate is three times larger than the estimated market value for nitrogen credits in the Pennsylvania Nitrogen Credit Trading Platform, which is about $3 per credit.”
At the current credit price, he says, it would take more than 30 years of nitrogen credit trading revenue to cover establishment costs for even the least expensive riparian buffer scenario.
Patrick Boleman, who graduated with a master’s degree in forest resources, contributed to the research.
The Northeast Woody/Warm-season Biomass Consortium and the USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture partially supported this work.
Source: Penn State University, which is solely responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.
You May Also Like
Current Conditions for
Enter a zip code to see the weather conditions for a different location.
This Week in Agribusiness, Dec. 9, 2023Dec 08, 2023
FFA Tribute: Caleb HorneDec 08, 2023
Grains face modest end-of-week cutsJan 18, 2023
USDA issues minor cuts to 2023/24 Brazil soybean cropDec 08, 2023