Farm Progress is part of the divisionName Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: NE
Cattle in field
INTEGRATING CATTLE: Some farmers participating in the project are moving beyond the traditional corn-soybean rotation by planting cover crops and incorporating cattle.

Farmers find solutions through soil health initiative

The project uses on-farm research to study the value of cover crops, grazing and extended crop rotations.

By Fernanda Souza Krupek, Andrea Basche, Daren Redfearn and Laura Thompson

How can we manage cropland to improve soil health? To address this common question from producers, conservationists and government representatives, a statewide partnership was launched among Nebraska producers, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Service in 2016.

The Soil Health Demonstration Initiative offers research and technical assistance to encourage farmers to adopt soil health practices such as no-till farming, cover cropping, extended crop rotations and integrating crops and livestock.

Through this project, more than 17 farmers are conducting in-field soil health management comparisons on more than 1,700 acres across Nebraska.

Solutions that work for farmers

To establish a network of demonstration sites, Nebraska farmers interested in conducting system-level soil health experiments applied to the Nebraska NRCS Soil Health Initiative to add an on-farm research component to their operation.

Although each collaborator is interested in addressing a specific soil health question, common and primary concerns include soil compaction, nutrient cycling, water quality, water and wind erosion, carbon storage, and microbial activity.

The farmers approved for this initiative are conducting strip trials on:

1. Cover crop mixture comparisons. Many farmers have expressed interest in planting multispecies cover crop mixtures to evaluate the suitability of several cover crop species and enhance ecosystem services.

Cover mixtures comprised of high and low carbon-to-nitrogen ratios, winter-hardy and winter-terminated cover crops, and single species and multispecies cover crops have been tested.

2. Cover crop seedling methods and planting dates. The relatively small window of opportunity for seeding cover crops in the fall has led growers to adaptive management practices to extend the cover crop season without delaying the planting of a cash crop.

Interseeding cover crop seeds into the standing cash crop with high-clearance equipment or aerial seeding equipment can be an option for farmers interested in including cover crops in their system.

Strip trial comparisons between interseeded cover crops into corn at the V4 to V6 growth stage versus dormant-seeded cover crops, as well as broadcast versus drilled cover crops, can bring farmers more data on expanding the cover crop growing window.

3. Cover crop termination timing and methods. Timing of cover crop termination is crucial to its success in delivering soil ecosystem functions. Terminating the cover crop just before planting the cash crop can allow more time for growth and biomass accumulation as compared with earlier termination (e.g., weeks or months before cash crop planting).

Cover crop termination timing’s effect on crop yield and soil health has been investigated, and this information can help improve our understanding of ecosystem benefits.

4. Livestock integration. Some farmers are moving beyond the traditional corn-soybean rotation by planting cover crops and incorporating cattle. Grazing cover crops can offer a return on investment and soil health benefits. Grazing and haying cover crops may increase farm profits, but the implications on soil health deserve further attention.

Determining the effect of cattle grazing cover crops on soil properties under different soil types and crop systems can help farmers identify opportunities for expanded cover crop residue use.

Findings from these long-term, in-field management comparisons will help farmers and crop scientists strategically manage the field and begin to identify the optimal environment and management combinations for improved soil health and crop production; help ecologists and conservation groups to explore practices that minimize soil erosion and maximize soil carbon sequestration; and help economists to identify profitable and regenerative agricultural pathways to boost farmers' income and productivity.

This initiative also can provide valuable information to help crop modelers refine useful tools that predict climate conditions and pave the way for a common framework for soil health assessment.

Krupek is an agronomy graduate research assistant; Basche is an assistant professor in cropping systems; Redfearn is an Extension forage crop residue specialist; and Thompson is an Extension educator at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Source: UNL CropWatch, which is solely responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.
Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish