Farm Progress is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: United States

Roberts: No excuse for farm bill delay

Roberts’ $7.35 billion agricultural assistance bill ensures that producers will receive Agricultural Market Transition Act or AMTA payments above last year’s levels if Congress does not finish a new farm bill in time for it to apply to the 2002 crops, he said in announcing the legislation.

The action came after House-Senate conference committee leaders announced that they would not complete a compromise farm bill before Congress left for its Easter-Passover recess. Instead, they said in a statement, conferees would return to work on the farm bill the week of April 9.

Roberts, a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said the legislation does not mean the farm bill is dead, but is intended to bea stopgap measure if a farm bill agreement is not in place soon.

“Most importantly, it allows our nation’s farmers and their bankers to plan their investments through 2002,” Roberts said. “Timing has become critical. Even if new farm legislation were passed shortly after Congress returns from the Easter recess, it would be too late to implement before late summer. That would be devastating for producers.”

The senator said his legislation relies on formulas used to calculate the 2000 AMTA payment, and thus could be implemented more easily by USDA. The year 2000 date was selected because it results in higher payments than the 2001 and 2002 AMTA formulas and the 2001 Market Loss Assistance (MLA) formula.

“American farmers know there is no excuse for the current farm bill situation in Congress,” he said. “The Senate, in passing a seriously flawed, partisan bill, has slowed the process and delayed much needed assistance from reaching producers.

“My legislation is designed to bridge the gap and protect farmers if a new farm bill can not be passed by Congress for the 2002 crop.”

Roberts and Sen. Thad Cochran of Mississippi introduced legislation that would have provided significantly higher AMTA payments for program crops and soybeans during the Senate’s debate on the new farm bill in December. But the proposal was rejected in favor of the Daschle-Harkin bill.

The latter contains higher loan rates and more spending for conservation programs. Sources have said resolving the difference in loan rates between the Senate and House bills was one of the stumbling blocks that caused the conferees to delay completion of the farm bill conference report this week.

Roberts said the introduction of his legislation does not mean that the farm bill is dead.

"Quite the contrary, staff of the conference committee members have been instructed to continue to work over the recess period in the hope that a bill can be completed shortly after Easter," he said.

"However, having been involved in numerous farm bills, I know that these conferences can often become quite contentious and bog down," Roberts said. "Furthermore, it is not going to be easy to implement this bill, not to mention the wisdom of simply pushing through a bill just so we can say it applies to the 2002 crop. "That may be easy to do this year, but it may be difficult to live under the problems we could create for the next five or six years." The senator also noted that many farmers in the South have begun spring planting and that producers across the nation will begin planting in the coming weeks.

Conference committee leaders did announce a framework agreement that spells out spending levels for the proposed farm bill. The agreement was being hailed by farm organizations as an important step in resolving the farm bill dilemma.

Here are the major provisions of the legislation introduced by Senator Roberts:

  • Market Loss Assistance (MLA) distribushelted through the AMTA payment formula with payments equal to the 2000 AMTA payment level. According to USDA, the 2000 AMTA payment for each crop was:
    • Wheat 58.8 cents/bushel
    • Corn 33.4 cents/bushel
    • Sorghum 40 cents/bushel
    • Barley 25.1 cents/bushel
    • Cotton 7.33 cents/pound
    • Rice $2.60/hundredweight

    This is the payment rate that producers would receive based upon the number of bushels they receive payments on under their existing AMTA contracts.

  • Oilseed Payments $466 million for direct payments to producers. This should be a payment of approximately 14 cents/bushel.
  • Peanuts 455.21 million for direct payments to producers
  • Honey $93 million to provide recourse loans to producers for 2002
  • Wool and Mohair $16.94 million in direct payments
  • Cottonseed Assistance $93 million
  • Specialty Crops $186 million for commodity purchases. No less than $55 million must be used for school lunch program purchases.
  • Continuation of LDP eligibility for crops harvested on non-AMTA acres in 2002.
  • LDP Graze-out for wheat, barley, and oats on the 2002 crop.
  • Dairy Extension of the dairy price support program through Dec. 31, 2002.
  • Pulse Crops $20 million for direct payments.
  • Tobacco $100 million for direct payments.
  • CRP Technical Assistance $44 million in 2002.
  • WRP $200 million for the enrollment of additional acres in 2002.
  • EQIP $300 million in additional funds for 2002.
  • Farmland Protection Program $161 million in additional funds.
  • Livestock Feed Assistance Program (LAP) $500 million for payments to producers for losses suffered in 2001 and 2002.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.