Western Farm Press Logo

An industry group has filed a motion seeking an en banc hearing, or review of the 3-judge panel’s decision.

Jason Resnick, Senior vice president and general counsel

May 10, 2021

2 Min Read
WFP-hearden-shipping-letter-040321.jpg
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court's injunction against applying AB 5, California's independent contractor law, to truck drivers.Tim Hearden

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has overturned an injunction that blocked the application of AB 5, California’s law governing the use of independent contractors, as it related to independent truckers.

The lawsuit was brought by the California Truckers Association (CTA) in December 2019, just before AB 5 went into effect. It persuaded a lower court to issue an injunction on the grounds that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA) preempted implementation of AB 5. That injunction has kept the state from enforcing AB 5 against the state’s trucking industry since the law went into effect on Jan. 1, 2020. 

But the appellate court ruled in a 2-1 decision that the FAAAA does not preempt the full implementation of AB 5. 

The CTA had argued that its members would suffer irreparable harm if AB 5 were to be applied to independent truckers, and Judge Mark Bennett agreed with that position in his dissent.

“California will now be free to enforce its preempted law,” Bennett said. “CTA’s members will now suffer irreparable injury. And the damage to the policies mandated by Congress will likely be profound.”

Port truck drivers have been particularly vocal in attempting to secure employee status, backed by the Teamsters union, who have alleged that many port drivers are misclassified as contractors.

The CTA has filed a motion seeking an en banc hearing, or review of the 3-judge panel’s decision, which if granted, would be heard by an 11-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit.

If the en banc petition is denied, the CTA could appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which could then result in the injunction remaining in place while the Supreme Court decides whether to take the case.

[Resnick is senior vice president and general counsel of Western Growers.]

Source: Western Growers, which is solely responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset. 

About the Author(s)

Jason Resnick

Senior vice president and general counsel, Western Growers

Jason Resnick is senior vice president and general counsel for Western Growers.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like