November 29, 2022

Floods. Wildfires. Drought. Hurricanes. Severe storms. The U.S. gets its fair share of climate calamities on an annual basis. In fact, the total tally of billion-dollar weather and climate disasters since 1980 is $2.2 trillion in infrastructure, buildings, road and crop losses.
“While billion-dollar disasters are responsible for an estimated 80% of total disaster-related losses, the combination of smaller disasters, heat waves and ongoing business disruptions that are not captured mean the overall economic turmoil is even greater than this analysis details,” notes a report from Environmental Entrepreneurs, a national, nonpartisan association that seeks out better economic and environmental policies.
E2 is quick to point out that climate change is not the sole cause of natural disasters, but climate trends are likely driving the frequency and severity of damaging events. According to data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. saw its four most-expensive wildfires, two of the top three costly hurricanes and the most damaging winter storm between 2017 and 2021.
A further breakdown shows how different parts of the country are more susceptible to different disasters. The southeastern U.S. mainly battles hurricanes, while Midwestern farms are more likely to face tornadoes and Western ones more commonly battle wildfires and drought. Here’s a cost breakdown by region for 1980-2022:
Southeast, $928 billion
Southwest, $410 billion
Midwest, $370 billion
Northeast, $203 billion
West, $154 billion
Mountain West, $71 billion
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, $143 billion
A look at state-by-state statistics shows by far that Texas, Louisiana and Florida have paid the price for climate disasters. California, North Carolina, Mississippi, New York, Iowa, Missouri and Illinois round out the top 10.
Those are the obvious problems, but what about solutions?
“A concerted effort across the public and private sectors is required to avert trillions of dollars in economic damages in the coming decades,” E2 argues. “Over the next few years, climate policies must rapidly reverse the growth in greenhouse gas emissions and scale clean energy technologies.”
Policies can help the cause. E2 notes that the recent Inflation Reduction Act includes $370 billion in funding for investments and programs that could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% below 2005 levels by 2030.
“The cost of inaction is unacceptable, but climate action gives us an incredible opportunity,” E2 concludes. “With significant and equitable upfront investment, we can reshape our economy to mitigate climate change and build climate resilience while creating jobs and protecting our most vulnerable populations.”
About the Author(s)
Senior editor, Farm Futures
Senior Editor Ben Potter brings more than 14 years of professional agricultural communications and journalism experience to Farm Futures. He began working in the industry in the highly specific world of southern row crop production. Since that time, he has expanded his knowledge to cover a broad range of topics relevant to agriculture, including agronomy, machinery, technology, business, marketing, politics and weather. He has won several writing awards from the American Agricultural Editors Association, most recently on two features about drones and farmers who operate distilleries as a side business. Ben is a graduate of the University of Missouri School of Journalism.
You May Also Like
Bulls start the week early
Jan 19, 2023Agriculture needs sustainable intensification
Jan 27, 2023Why future corn rows may be narrower
Jan 26, 2023
Soybeans extend rally on South American weather
Jan 18, 2023Figure out the best place to invest your time
Jan 30, 2023Did your marketing plan work?
Jan 30, 2023USDA exports – Japan buys corn, Jan. 30, 2023
Jan 19, 2023