Farm Futures logo

Sorting through the data

Let’s take a look at where things finished for the week, what drove values and how it will all influence trade moving forward.

Brian Splitt, Technical analyst

July 10, 2020

4 Min Read

Last month’s blog laid out a list of expectations as we moved into the key marketing timeframe for the year. In hindsight the list looks accurate, but I can’t help but feel disappointed with the way things have played out over the last 30 days. Let’s take a look at where things finished for the week, what drove values and how it will all influence trade moving forward.

On June 10, prompt December Corn settled at 341’4; the July 10 settlement was 344’6. When we consider what the market digested in between, the fact that it all only warranted a three-cent move should be sobering. First, the sharp reduction in corn acres shown in the Planted Acreage Report was enough to definitively bottom corn values at the end of June. We knew new crop production on Friday’s July WASDE report would be significantly reduced for corn simply due to that decrease in planted acres. This was rectified on the balance sheet and 995 million bushels were shaved off production. While a production drop of this magnitude is significant, we must remember that 2.648 billion bushels of corn is not a bullish carryout estimate. Second, market participants have been closely watching weather models which have flip-flopped between hot and dry some days to more moderate temperatures and adequate precipitation other days. The forecast was in the category of the latter as we finished the week which added to pressure into Friday’s close. Lastly, trade with China had some positive news with an announced sale of 1,365,000 MT of corn. That is until Bloomberg reported later in the day that President Trump was quoted saying, “The relationship with China has been severely damaged” and a phase two trade deal with China isn’t under consideration.

Technically December Corn has what appears to be a weekly double top with this week’s high of 362’0 unable to break through last week’s high of 363’0. In between making those two weekly highs, December Corn made a low mid-week at 347’4. Friday’s close below 347’4 to finish the week is a negative development technically and would suggest a major high has been made in the corn market. A move above 363’0 is now needed to change that sentiment and rallies are to be sold.

Soybeans could still have a story moving forward and are more likely to find buying from a hot and dry forecast as models next week will start to look at early August weather. Even though USDA increased their estimate of new crop soybeans to 425 million bushels, the increase is not material enough to offset a yield reduction from trend should weather models start that conversation. A late summer rally in soybeans might just be the thing that gives us another shot at recent highs for corn, but without help from weather moving forward the onus will be on demand to bring rallies at a time when concerns about a second surge of COVID and trade tensions reemerge.

Everything can turn around again with the right forecast on a Sunday night, but developments this week need to be taken at face value. The calendar is a week past July 4th, there is a double top on the chart, corn made new lows for the month and closed near the low on a WASDE report day. 

Reach Brian Splitt at 847-946-2080 or [email protected]

The risk of loss in trading futures and/or options is substantial and each investor and/or trader must consider whether this is a suitable investment. AgMarket.Net is the Farm Division of John Stewart and Associates (JSA) based out of St Joe, MO and all futures and options trades are cleared through ADMIS in Chicago IL. This material has been prepared by an agent of JSA or a third party and is, or is in the nature of, a solicitation. By accepting this communication, you agree that you are an experienced user of the futures markets, capable of making independent trading decisions, and agree that you are not, and will not, rely solely on this communication in making trading decisions. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by simulated historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. Trading infromation and advice is based on information taken from 3rd party sources that are believed to be reliable. We do not guarantee that such information is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Trading advice reflects our good faith judgment at a specific time and is subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that the advice we give will result in profitable trades. The services provided by JSA may not be available in all jurisdictions. It is possible that the country in which you are a resident prohibits us from opening and maintaining an account for you. 

The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of Farm Futures or Farm Progress. 

About the Author(s)

Brian Splitt

Technical analyst, AgMarket.Net

Brian began his career in the financial services industry with expertise in insurance products, stocks, bonds, mutual funds and annuities. Brian studied technical analysis and migrated to commodities where he has built a successful career. As a technical analyst with AgMarket.Net, he utilizes prior price or volume action or trends to predict future price moves and break down agricultural balance sheets. Brian is a decorated combat veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom as well as a member of a Gold Star Family.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like