Farm field runoff not necessarily source of sedimentation 273895Farm field runoff not necessarily source of sedimentation
The source of sediment load in rivers is often attributed to erosion and runoff from farm fields. But ARS hydrologist Glenn Wilson spent several years looking more closely at the causes and his studies focused on how seepage—the lateral movement of water through the ground—could prompt conditions that led to stream bank failure.
February 28, 2011
Much of the Mississippi River's sediment load doesn't come from field runoff, according to work by scientists at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Instead, the scientists with USDA's Agricultural Research Service (ARS) have confirmed that stream bank collapse and failure can be chief contributors to high sediment levels in the silty streams and rivers that flow into the Mississippi. ARS is USDA's chief intramural scientific research agency.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency lists sediment as the most common pollutant of rivers, streams, lakes and reservoirs in the United States. Trapped sediment can reduce the useful lifespan of dams and reservoirs, exacerbate flooding, harm aquatic plants and animals, and transport other pollutants downstream. Over the years, billions of dollars have been spent on stream bank protection and restoration efforts to stem erosion and reduce sedimentation loads.
The source of this sediment load is often attributed to erosion and runoff from farm fields. But ARS hydrologist Glenn Wilson, who works at the agency's National Sedimentation Laboratory in Oxford, Miss., spent several years looking more closely at the causes of stream bank erosion. His studies focused on how seepage—the lateral movement of water through the ground—could prompt conditions that led to stream bank failure.
Wilson and others confirmed for the first time that a stable stream bank can quickly become unstable when seepage erosion is added to the mix of factors that promote bank failure. They found that seepage from stream banks was eroding layers of soil that subsequently would wash down the face of the stream bank and into the stream itself. This added to the sediment load in the stream and also left the bank itself weakened and vulnerable to collapse.
The researchers concluded that stream bank failure may stem as much—or more—from the effect of seepage erosion undercutting the stream banks as from the added weight of the waterlogged stream banks.
Read more about this research in the February 2011 issue of Agricultural Research magazine.
You May Also Like
Current Conditions for
Enter a zip code to see the weather conditions for a different location.
Will Hoosiers recognize farmland loss as an issue?Sep 28, 2023
Stocks data, shutdown threat pressures pricesOct 02, 2023
New England’s best dairiesSep 28, 2023
Farmers look to repeat successful 2022 selling strategies in 2023Oct 02, 2023
When to harvest lodged cornOct 02, 2023
Importance of reproductive efficiencyOct 02, 2023
Farm Progress America, October 3, 2023Oct 02, 2023