is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist
Irrigation management improves efficiency

Irrigation management improves efficiency

An increasingly important irrigation efficiency motivation for many growers is mitigating the effects of limited and declining irrigation water availability. Regardless of the primary goal, effective and efficient irrigation management is essential to maximizing water use efficiency in crop production.

Conserving water resources and reducing irrigation-related production costs are great reasons to improve irrigation efficiency.  An increasingly important irrigation efficiency motivation for many growers, however, is mitigating the effects of limited and declining irrigation water availability. Regardless of the primary goal, effective and efficient irrigation management is essential to maximizing water use efficiency in crop production.

Water use efficiencyis determined by the harvestable yield of a crop per unit of water used or applied. Increasing the water use efficiency can be achieved by producing more crop yield for a given amount of water and/or maintaining crop yield with less water.  While water often is the limiting factor to crop yield, particularly in arid and semi-arid production regions, it is very important that water management is considered in the context of the overall crop production system. 

If the cropping system is restricted primarily by limited water capacity, optimizing water management can result in increased crop yields and/or quality.  However, irrigation alone will not solve every problem.

Crop rotation

Consider crop rotations and variety selections to mitigate risks associated with water quality (salinity) issues as well as pest pressures.  Adopt good Integrated Pest Management practices to address insect, weed and disease concerns. Apply Integrated Crop Management strategies to optimize fertilizers and other inputs. 

Advanced irrigation application technologies, including low pressure center pivot irrigation (Low Energy Precision Application – LEPA; Low Elevation Spray Application – LESA; Mid-Elevation Spray Application – Mesa; or Low Pressure In-Canopy - LPIC) and micro-irrigation (including Subsurface Drip Irrigation) can be managed effectively to achieve high application efficiency and excellent distribution uniformity.

Operating at relatively low pressures, they require less energy (and therefore lower cost) per volume of water than high pressure sprinkler methods.  With good management, they can also deliver water with lower evaporation losses than high pressure sprinkler systems and result in lower surface runoff and deep percolation losses than surface irrigation. Hence they can bring about both energy and water savings, or at least increased energy and water efficiency.

Best Management Practicesinclude irrigation scheduling to better match timing and rate of water available to crop water requirements, as well as strategies to minimize water losses through runoff, evaporation, and deep percolation (leaching).

Irrigation schedulingis essential to increasing water use efficiency. Techniques commonly used to determine “when” and “how much” to irrigate include weather-based methods, soil moisture monitoring methods and plant indicator methods. Weather-based evapotranspiration “ET” models apply local weather data and crop-specific information to provide accurate estimates of crop water use.  This information is made available by regional ET networks and delivered through e-mail, fax and/or internet.  Soil moisture monitoring includes an array of methods, from the hand sampling “look and feel” method, to tensiometers, to granular matrix and gypsum resistance blocks, to capacitance and time domain reflectometry sensors.  Soil moisture monitoring methods vary widely in cost, relative convenience, applicability and ease of use.

Moisture monitoring

Plant-based indicators include canopy temperature and time-temperature threshold methods as well as plant water potential (pressure chambers, “pressure bomb”) methods.  Even better is a combination of multiple methods, such as using crop ET estimates as a primary scheduling method, with soil moisture monitoring to verify that the ET estimates are on track. 

One of the main obstacles to adopting irrigation scheduling is the commitment of extra labor and time to collect the field data and additional management time to interpret and apply the information to irrigation decisions.  Convenient data acquisition, processing and interpretation tools are becoming more widely available and should greatly improve the feasibility and adoption of irrigation scheduling methods.

Irrigation management is part of the overall water management program.  Take full advantage of precipitation.  This means maximizing the benefits of rainfall received during the cropping season, as well as maximizing storage of moisture from off-season precipitation. Where applicable, terracing, furrow diking, contour farming and conservation tillage practices can reduce runoff losses of irrigation and rainfall.

Optimum use of soil moisture storage requires a working knowledge of soil moisture characteristics and the effective crop root zone.  Loam and clay loam soils can have relatively high plant available water storage capacities (1.5  to 2 inches of water per foot of soil depth). Sandy soils often have much lower soil moisture storage capacities (one inch or less of water per foot of soil depth). 

Many agronomic crops can have active roots to depths of 5 or 6 feet; however, many will extract most of their water requirement from the top 1 to 3 feet of soil.  Site-specific soil conditions, including plow pans, caliche layers, excessively dry or excessively wet soil conditions, can limit effective root zone depths. Generally speaking, because plants need both oxygen and water for healthy root systems, roots develop best in moist (neither saturated nor extremely dry) soil. Local USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and Extension specialists and agents can provide additional information on soil moisture monitoring and soil moisture storage characteristics.             

Soil moisture storage information can be used in applying a Management Allowable Depletion strategy.  Management Allowable Depletion is similar in concept to a minimum balance requirement on a checking account.  If too much water is removed from the soil, the resultant drought stress on the crop can result in a yield loss “penalty.”

For many crops, recommendations call for a “minimum balance” of about 50 percent plant available soil moisture should be retained in the soil to prevent drought stress of the crop.  Therefore, irrigation would be managed to replace depleted soil moisture before the soil water storage drops below the 50 percent plant available water “minimum balance.”  For drought sensitive crops, the “minimum balance” should be more conservative to reduce risk of drought stress.

Deficit management

Another irrigation management strategy is often referred to as deficit irrigation management, or more appropriately “managed deficit irrigation.” Deficit irrigation management often is adopted by default due to insufficient irrigation capacity (such as limited well capacities). 

“Managed deficit irrigation” can be more creatively applied to optimize water allocation, whether optimizing the timing of irrigation application for improved crop response or allocating limited water resources between crops in a rotation, taking into account relative drought tolerances of the crops and relative drought sensitivities (or crop response to water) based upon crop growth/developmental stage.

 For instance, drought stress early in a cotton crop (squaring) likely will have a greater relative impact on lint yield than much later in the season (after first open boll).

Corn is most sensitive to drought stress during the critical period two weeks before and after silking.  Managed deficit can also encourage other desired crop-specific product quality responses, such as sugar content, maturity or ease of harvest. 

A note of caution regarding interpretation of water use efficiency may be in order.  Defining “full irrigation” as providing all the water a crop can use, some (but not all) crops seem to respond well to slightly deficit irrigation.  More severe drought stress will result in yield loss, even if the overall “water use efficiency” may be higher.  Conversely, crop responses to incremental improvements in water management are more obvious in more severely water-limited conditions. 

Some very good irrigation technologies and management tools are available, and, appropriately used, they can net some excellent results.  Effective and efficient irrigation management is crucial to conserve water, reduce irrigation costs, and achieve water use efficiency and crop production goals.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.