Missouri Ruralist logo

More civil penalties to come in Missouri dicamba drift allegations.

Mindy Ward, Editor, Missouri Ruralist

December 18, 2017

2 Min Read
CIVIL ACTION: Applicators who sprayed illegally in 2016 are seeing civil penalties mount in the wake of dicamba investigations.

Eight applicators who sprayed dicamba in 2016 and caused damage to nearby crops received civil penalties ranging from $1,500 to $62,250.

In October, Missouri Department of Agriculture Director Chris Chinn said that fines for dicamba drift damage were forthcoming. Saturday, she announced those fines along with locations. The first round focused on complaints in Dunklin County in southeast Missouri.

Federal officials are still investigating six applicators that allegedly used dicamba off-label. The six applicators were named by 83 (of the 121) complainants. Once the federal partners have completed their investigations, the department will finalize enforcement action against the applicators.

In 2016, the blame for injury was on old herbicide technology sprayed off-label over dicamba-resistant cotton and soybean technology. Then, the Missouri Department of Agriculture cautioned farmers that it was a violation of federal law to use any dicamba product with Bollgard II XtendFlex or Roundup Ready 2 Xtend Soybeans, because neither was labeled for use. Still, some ignored the warnings and sprayed.

In 2016, the state ag department completed 121 complainant investigations. They went on to investigate 60 applicators.

As a result, here are the following civil penalties issued:

Link_20-_201218M2-1847B.jpg

All civil penalties collected for violations of the law will go to the school district where the violation occurred.

“It is important for appropriate enforcement action to be issued in order to deter off-label use and protect the integrity of agriculture,” Chinn said in a news release. “We are in the final stages of our case review of 2016 investigations and continuing our field investigations of 2017 complaints, and will release information as cases close.”

There were 311 alleged dicamba drift incidents that year. However, new technology formulations like FeXapan, Engenia and XtendiMax were approved for use over dicamba-resistant cotton and soybeans, making the process more cumbersome.

About the Author(s)

Mindy Ward

Editor, Missouri Ruralist

Mindy resides on a small farm just outside of Holstein, Mo, about 80 miles southwest of St. Louis.

After graduating from the University of Missouri-Columbia with a bachelor’s degree in agricultural journalism, she worked briefly at a public relations firm in Kansas City. Her husband’s career led the couple north to Minnesota.

There, she reported on large-scale production of corn, soybeans, sugar beets, and dairy, as well as, biofuels for The Land. After 10 years, the couple returned to Missouri and she began covering agriculture in the Show-Me State.

“In all my 15 years of writing about agriculture, I have found some of the most progressive thinkers are farmers,” she says. “They are constantly searching for ways to do more with less, improve their land and leave their legacy to the next generation.”

Mindy and her husband, Stacy, together with their daughters, Elisa and Cassidy, operate Showtime Farms in southern Warren County. The family spends a great deal of time caring for and showing Dorset, Oxford and crossbred sheep.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like