is part of the Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

  • American Agriculturist
  • Beef Producer
  • Corn and Soybean Digest
  • Dakota Farmer
  • Delta Farm Press
  • Farm Futures
  • Farm Industry news
  • Indiana Prairie Farmer
  • Kansas Farmer
  • Michigan Farmer
  • Missouri Ruralist
  • Nebraska Farmer
  • Ohio Farmer
  • Prairie Farmer
  • Southeast Farm Press
  • Southwest Farm Press
  • The Farmer
  • Wallaces Farmer
  • Western Farm Press
  • Western Farmer Stockman
  • Wisconsin Agriculturist

European farmers hit with strict environmental CAP criteria

The European Commission has proposed a controversial reform of the European Union (EU) Common Agriculture Policy (CAP). The plan calls for stringent environmental criteria including a requirement to put 7 percent of a farm’s land into conservation crops in order to receive direct payments.

The European Commission has proposed a controversial reform of the European Union (EU) Common Agriculture Policy (CAP). The plan calls for stringent environmental criteria including a requirement to put 7 percent of a farm’s land into conservation crops in order to receive direct payments. There is also a proposal to modify the rules governing distribution of assistance so that Eastern European countries get more of the CAP payments.

One of the controversial provisions would require farmers who receive direct payments to “increase crop diversification, fallow land and preserve ecological reserves and landscapes.” The proposed criteria would apply to 30 percent of farmers' current direct payments. The proposals also call for phasing-in limitations to establish a ceiling on direct payments. The adjustments will redirect subsidies based on the farm’s number of employees. This is designed to reduce the benefits gap between Western Europe, many of whose farms are relatively large and highly mechanized, and Eastern and Central Europe where farms are smaller.

The controversial proposals, which must be approved by the EU member states in the Council of Ministers and by the European Parliament, also triggered immediate criticism from the leading agriculture lobby group called COPA-COGECA. It argued that the proposals do not move EU agriculture toward producing enough food to feed the world's growing population at affordable levels saying, “It does not make sense to require every single farm to stop producing on a certain percentage of their land (ecological set-aside) when world food demand is set to rise by 70 percent by 2050 and production is threatened by more extremes of drought, flooding and storms.”

Environmental groups were not happy with the proposal saying the plan fails to live up to previous promises to “green” the EU CAP.

The EU CAP, which accounts for more than 60 percent of the EU's $120 billion annual budget, has been the subject of criticism because it is said to be “outdated, receives a disproportionate share of EU funding and distorts world agriculture markets.”

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish