Farm Progress is part of the divisionName Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Serving: United States
capitol building

Mississippi senator wants USDA to regulate cell-cultured meat

Cindy Hyde-Smith says bill codifies formal agreement USDA and FDA signed in March.

Mississippi Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith has introduced legislation giving USDA primary responsibility to regulate, inspect, and label cell-cultured meat and poultry marketed to U.S. consumers.

The Cell-Cultured Meat and Poultry Regulation Act of 2019 (S.1056) would codify the responsibilities of the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service and the Food and Drug Administration over food products grown in laboratories from animal cell cultures.

“Our federal food safety laws need to be updated to address the scientific effort to create imitation meat in laboratories.  American consumers deserve to know the food they eat is unadulterated, wholesome, and properly labeled, and the federal agencies responsible for these guarantees deserve clear direction from Congress over jurisdiction,” said Hyde-Smith, who serves on the Senate Agriculture Committee and as chairman of the Subcommittee on Livestock, Marketing, and Agriculture Security. The bill was introduced April 4 and referred to the referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.

S.1056 would place cell-cultured food products derived from livestock, poultry, or any other amenable species under FSIS jurisdiction by amending the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products Inspection Act, the primary laws governing the FSIS jurisdiction and oversight responsibilities.

FSIS and FDA over the past year have claimed responsibility over cell-culture meat and poultry.  In the absence of statutory requirements, the agencies in March signed a formal agreement outlining a joint-regulatory framework for lab-grown meat.  The agreement, however, states that it “does not create binding, enforceable obligations against either agency,” and that it is subject to “the availability of personnel, resources, and funds.”

Related: USDA, FDA announce plan to regulate cell-cultured food

“While I am encouraged by the USDA-FDA framework, it is nonbinding and subject to modification or termination every three years,” said Hyde-Smith, a Republican.  “My bill essentially codifies the terms of that agreement. The fact that FDA and USDA have agreed to identify necessary changes to statutory authority confirms the need for a legislative fix as I’ve proposed.”

Agriculture and livestock organizations in Mississippi and across the country have been vocal about their desire for USDA FSIS to have jurisdiction.

“As a cattle producer myself, I am proud of the beef we grow. And let me be clear, beef is raised in a pasture, not a laboratory,” Hyde-Smith said.

“If companies producing lab-grown products want to be considered equal to U.S. farm-raised beef, they need to undergo the same level of inspection and scrutiny as the U.S. cattle industry.  I don’t believe they deserve to ride on the coattails of real cattle farmers with respect to labeling.  The USDA mark of inspection carries weight.  I am confident USDA is the appropriate agency to handle this responsibility,” she said.

Source: Office of Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, which is solely responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset
Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.