Farm Futures logo

Bipartisan members urge Administrator Regan to maximize benefits of RFS.

Jacqui Fatka, Policy editor

April 8, 2021

2 Min Read
Petmal/iStock/Thinkstock

The bipartisan Congressional Biofuels Caucus extended an invitation to meet with EPA Administrator Michael Regan to discuss the Renewable Fuel Standard and other biofuels priorities.

In a letter to Regan, the members urged the administrator to maximize the benefits of the RFS, particularly given the statutory shift that requires the agency to determine Renewable Volumes Obligations starting in 2023 with consultation with the secretary of energy and secretary of agriculture.

“We implore you to work across agencies to build on existing programs and policies that seek new opportunities that will promote the growth in the usage of higher ethanol and biodiesel blends,” the letter states.

The letter says biofuels are an integral part of sound environmental policy that serves to keep and create home-grown jobs and generates demand for American farmers. A recent report found that greenhouse gas emissions from corn ethanol are 46% lower than gasoline.

“The role of biofuels provides a compelling story that must be utilized to achieve carbon emission reduction goals. Biofuels producers need to be included in any climate conversation, and rural America must not be left behind,” the legislators add.

In an exclusive interview with Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., co-chair of the Congressional Biofuels Caucus, he notes there is strong support on both sides of the aisle for the RFS. He says as of now, there’s not enough known on how the Biden administration will tackle issues important to the biofuels sector.

He says the Trump administration could be a little “Jekyll and Hyde” on biofuels as it balanced the internal competition of the Oklahoma and Texas oil guys fighting with farm and corn state Republicans. Johnson says similarly within the Democratic Party and Democrat-controlled White House, it’s unknown who’s going to win.

“Is it going to be farm state Democrats or is it going to be more pure environmentalists,” Johnson questions.

He notes the fact that biofuels are 46% less carbon intensive than gasoline points to biofuels being a big part of the climate solution. He says there are some purists who don’t like half measures and they may be better positioned to win in this White House.

“That’s unfortunate. But we’re going to keep doing what we can to build coalitions, because I think biofuels are a big part of the solution,” Johnson says.

Read more about:

BiofuelsRFS

About the Author(s)

Jacqui Fatka

Policy editor, Farm Futures

Jacqui Fatka grew up on a diversified livestock and grain farm in southwest Iowa and graduated from Iowa State University with a bachelor’s degree in journalism and mass communications, with a minor in agriculture education, in 2003. She’s been writing for agricultural audiences ever since. In college, she interned with Wallaces Farmer and cultivated her love of ag policy during an internship with the Iowa Pork Producers Association, working in Sen. Chuck Grassley’s Capitol Hill press office. In 2003, she started full time for Farm Progress companies’ state and regional publications as the e-content editor, and became Farm Futures’ policy editor in 2004. A few years later, she began covering grain and biofuels markets for the weekly newspaper Feedstuffs. As the current policy editor for Farm Progress, she covers the ongoing developments in ag policy, trade, regulations and court rulings. Fatka also serves as the interim executive secretary-treasurer for the North American Agricultural Journalists. She lives on a small acreage in central Ohio with her husband and three children.

Subscribe to receive top agriculture news
Be informed daily with these free e-newsletters

You May Also Like